Bouchlaghem, K A D and Pasquire, C (2009) An information-led process framework for hybrid projects. In: Dainty, A R J (ed.) Proceedings of 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
Building adaptation is the broad term used to describe any work to a building beyond maintenance. A hybrid building project is a phrase used for the benefit of research, to define a type of adaptation project where new elements or buildings are combined with existing buildings within the same spatial boundary. The hybrid building process of addition or extension of spatial, structural, façade systems, etc. should result in a singular compound building and not a building of separate parts. The hybrid process has similarities with traditional new build projects but it also offers unique situations that often require a different approach. This is because the approach to design, planning and construction will differ for adapting an existing building, compared to new build. In addition, as-built information will directly influence the design-specific stages of the process. This paper presents a comparative study of design-related variations using the standard RIBA design process. The result was mapped to highlight information, decision and activity flows for a hybrid project framework which has been evaluated by industry experts. A summary of findings from the latter is also presented.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | as-built information; building adaptation; design decision; hybrid building process; hybrid project |
| Index terms: | adaptation, new build, design process, building process, design decision, variation, comparative study |
| Subjects: | building construction, construction integration, design practice, contractual condition, research design and methodology, user focus, design methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Design Practice, Site Management, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here