Lowry, M B (2008) An online analytic-deliberative approach to public participation for transportation investment decisions. PhD thesis, University of Washington, USA.
Abstract
In the United States transportation planners and decision-makers are progressively turning to local taxes to finance transportation improvements. These measures, such as an increase in the sales tax or gas tax, offer the opportunity to pay for critical projects which might not be afforded otherwise. Typically the tax increases are proposed as ballot initiatives and require voter approval. Unfortunately, the public does not always agree with the projects that have been chosen for the proposals. Experience has shown that success at the ballot is more likely when there is ample public participation when deciding which taxes should be increased and which project(s) should receive the funding. The traditional approach to public participation is the "town hall meeting." This dissertation introduces an innovative approach that uses today's information and communication technologies to involve a greater number of people. In the approach, an optimization tool is used to help the participants analyze the decision; and online discussion tools are used to help them deliberate over the issues. These tools are presented in the context of a case study in which members of the public were invited to analyze and discuss a transportation investment decision for the Seattle, Washington metropolitan area. The case study occurred over the Internet for a 31 day period and involved 133 participants.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Rutherford, G S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | optimization; communication; funding; investment; participation; public participation; United States; case study |
| Index terms: | proposal, United States, approval, information and communication technology, public participation, Seattle, case study, internet, dissertation, investment decision, funding, planner |
| Subjects: | Geography, computing systems, contractual role, profession, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, economic analysis, project planning, participation process |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here