Rosas Sanchez, L (2008) Application of game modeling to good tunneling practice. PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA.
Abstract
A more extensive use of tunneling and underground facilities is expected in the coming future, especially in urban areas. However, tunneling construction involves inherent risks that are unique and based on unknown and unpredictable underground conditions (no matter the effort to quantify material properties and their behavior). Due to the risk inherent in tunneling, a climate of good "social'' relationships is another feature of success. Owners' decisions, actions, and inactions (mainly in contractual terms) affect not only the response of contractors, but also the liability risk exposure of engineering professionals. Tunneling projects today must not only make use of the most sophisticated knowledge and technology available, but must also meet principles of fair and realistic risk allocation. Therefore, new approaches beyond the limited technical domain are required. The essential scope of the thesis is to propose Game Modeling as an analysis tool to help guide good tunneling practice. The function of game theory is to provide an abstract framework for modeling situations involving interdependence choice. In this thesis, strategic interactions in tunneling are modeled as games in order to throw light on existing and unrecognized problems. Using game modeling, it can be shown that tunneling collapses and disasters are essentially derived from management deficiencies, often of structural rather than personal nature. The approach provides analysis for explanations for success and for no repetition of mistakes. Chapter 1 is an introductory chapter where the overall scope of the thesis is presented. Chapter 2 examines the fundamental issues affecting the tunneling industry. Chapters 3, 4 and 5 present a brief game theory framework: game theory is a branch of mathematics devoted to the logic of decision making in social interactions; and utility theory is a cornerstone of game theory which is used for solving games. Chapter 6 illustrates the potential applications of game modeling to tunneling: two real cases studies are used to illustrate the first level of abstraction in game theory: games in extensive form. Finally, chapter 7 provides the conclusions and recommendations.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Amadei, B and Molenaar, K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | liability; game theory; utility theory; contractual term; games; tunnel; decision making; owner; professional; mathematics |
| Index terms: | decision-making, urban area, contractual term, exposure, tunnel, liability, material property, game theory, utility theory, risk allocation, interdependence, social interaction, modelling, interaction, owner |
| Subjects: | urban form and morphology, public and environmental health, contract structure, financial risk, material properties and characteristics, decision analysis, sociology, organizational analysis, liability law, behavioral psychology, economic theory, infrastructure and transport systems, decision models, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here