Wu, J (2008) A behavioral analysis of learning processes amongst construction project team members in China. PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Abstract
The driving force behind the development of learning theory is the assumption that individuals require an effective learning ability if they are to succeed in a complex, competitive, and changing world. Hence, the construction firms in China must act upon the knowledge resulting from learning in order to continuously improve their performance. However, as learning must take individuals as agents, the learning processes among construction team members in China are analyzed from the behavioral aspect. The aim is to investigate the relationship between learning behaviors and job performance, which is ultimately aggregated into the whole firm’s performance. In this research, a model is developed and tested to depict the reasonable causalities among project team members’ previous job performances, future learning behaviors, and the subsequent performance by a continuous cycle. The model is developed based on goal-behavior-performance-outcome cycle, together with other learning theories. It is hypothesized that project team members’ previous job performance can influence future learning behaviors, and such influence is mediated by the team members’ feelings of satisfaction. However, depending on the content and depth of the knowledge change within individuals, the learning behaviors in this research are classified into three levels hierarchically: adaptive learning, reconstructive learning, and process learning. Different levels of the learning process result in the different changes of the future learning behaviors. A field study was conducted to quantitatively test the hypotheses by means of a questionnaire elaborated theoretically and situationally. Using the SEM technique, the priori hypothesized structural relations were statistically identified. Consistencies between postulated hypotheses and the empirical outcomes are evident. Testing results show that a project team member’s previous job performance has a significant influence on future learning behaviors. The influence of previous job performance differs according to level of the learning process. Specifically, previous job performance influences behavior pattern resulting from adaptive learning; it influences the goal setting phrase resulting from reconstructive learning; and it influences the team member’s learning orientation resulting from process learning. All those influences are mediated by the team member’s feeling of satisfaction. Through the understanding of the learning processes among project team members, a more thorough understanding enquiry into the nature of learning can be stimulated. This understanding may guide managers of construction firms, as well as the project managers, to better handle their team members’ learning processes, which ultimately leads to continuous improvement. Such performance helps the construction firms survive intense competition.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | continuous improvement; project team; construction firms; construction project; learning; construction team; China; project manager |
| Index terms: | project team, testing, construction team, continuous improvement, satisfaction, construction project team, project manager, China, agent, questionnaire, competition, learning theory, construction project, construction firm, field study, manager |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, profession, learning theory, organization, professional practice, project delivery, production management, Geography, performance measurement, research methods, market analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here