Collaborative optimisation in building design with a Pareto-based genetic algorithm

Yang, F (2008) Collaborative optimisation in building design with a Pareto-based genetic algorithm. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.

Abstract

Large-scale building design is a constantly evolving discipline. Design managers are consistently trying to identify means for producing a better product in a shorter period of time. Hence there is a need for design assistant tools that can help designers understand the big picture. It is becoming hard to improve the system performance of building design based merely on advances in individual disciplines. In other words, improvements in individual disciplines alone are not sufficient to affect the improvements in the whole system. To achieve higher quality, system-orientated, holistic, multidisciplinary approaches to building design are needed (NSF, 1996). For this reason, this research investigates the applicability of multidisciplinary disciplinary optimisation (MDO) methodology in building design. The MDO methods divide a single system into a group of smaller sub-systems and effectively manage interactions between sub-systems. In the context of building design, the single system refers to the whole building design, and sub-system could be each disciplinary design. Such approaches could reduce the time and cost associated with the multidisciplinary design cycle. This thesis describes the work of developing collaborative optimisation framework with a Pareto based genetic algorithm (COPGA).

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: optimisation; building design; designer
Index terms: interaction, building design, becoming, designer, methodology, design manager, genetic algorithm
Subjects: profession, architectural design, algorithms, research methods, behavioral psychology, philosophical process
Topics: Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here