Al-Shahrani, M S (2009) Developing a framework of knowledge management system for project management in the construction industry. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Knowledge has been increasingly valued in recent years, because it reflects best practice and therefore the success of an organisation or business. Organisations seek better methods of knowledge management (KM), to assist them in motivating their employees to capture, transfer and share knowledge. These are the strategic and people aspects of KM. This research will develop a new framework to represent KM systems (KMS), the objective being to store the knowledge which the organisation has in databases and retrieve it when needed. It consists of four phases, the first of which deals with enterprise project management, whereby project information is transferred to software, some being manipulated via IT and the remainder by human resources, manipulation of human resources depend on their experiences and using methods of knowledge sharing, and the result of this manipulation being recognized as knowledge. The second phase consists of the automatic capture and transfer of this knowledge to a multi-dimensional database; phase three is the building of an E-library, where the knowledge is distributed within the database according to its characteristics; and the fourth and final phase is the measurement of KMS performance, where baseline knowledge derived from earlier projects is used in planning the next one. This will affect the revenues of the organisation, so that this phase represents an objective way of measuring KMS performance.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best practice; knowledge capture; knowledge management; performance; employee |
| Index terms: | database, knowledge management system, construction industry, project management, best practice, knowledge sharing, revenue, knowledge capture, knowledge management, human resource |
| Subjects: | data management, information systems, industry analysis, management, project management theory and practice, professional development, economic analysis, knowledge management, business |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here