Du, Q (2009) Integrated decision-making in the cladding supply chain. PhD thesis, University of Bath, UK.
Abstract
The cladding industry is relatively independent and complex, having contemporary features in a rapidly changing sector of the construction industry. The increasing complexity of the cladding procurement and fragmentation of the supply chain bring challenges for making informed decisions. The purpose of this research was to study the cladding design and procurement process, in particular the decision making process. It was hoped to develop an integrated decision making mechanism within the context of the cladding supply chain. Based on preliminary exploration, a conceptual model of integrated communication and decision-making (ICDM) was proposed. Within this model, an Information and Communication (I&C) Hub acts as the pivotal platform of the information supply and communication in the supply chain and is managed by an industry level third party. It provides an effective and secure approach to information exchange and collaborative decision making. A questionnaire survey was the key method of this research, while industry meetings and informal interviews were employed to provide in-depth understanding of the communication related issues in the industry. It was found that the participants of the cladding supply chain were experiencing difficulties of identifying information sources and accessing information, and that an industry level third party acting as an independent information source could be accepted by the cladding industry. Therefore, the I&C Hub gained its necessity and partial feasibility. It was also found that training opportunity for practitioners was limited and the usage of ICT had a large potential for improvement. A number of modifications on the I&C Hub and information flows within the ICDM were proposed to enhance its practicality, and the enhanced model was presented and evaluated by an industry meeting. The conceptual model can only be completely validated by real cases; therefore, this study concluded with a recommendation for testing the framework in future pilot projects.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ledbetter, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication; complexity; decision making; interview; procurement; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | complexity, decision-making, exploration, questionnaire, practitioner, fragmentation, information flow, information exchange, survey, interview, procurement process, construction industry, testing, cladding, decision-making process, platform |
| Subjects: | digital design, information systems, systems engineering, industry analysis, decision analysis, practitioner, business, data collection methods, data science, professional practice, contractual arrangements, building materials, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Procurement, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here