Gyadu-Asiedu, W (2009) Assessing construction project performance in Ghana: modelling practitioners' and clients perspectives. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands.
Abstract
Several countries at various levels of socio-economic development have recognised the need and importance of taking measures to improve the performance of their construction industry. One of the means to this end has been to ensure performance efficiency in construction project execution. As has been widely acknowledged, this requires a deliberate process of continuously monitoring the performance of projects based on relevant indicators. To this end, several models have been proposed in literature assess projects under the broad headings of critical success factors and key performance indicators. However, these objectives are faced with several drawbacks. These has to do with the difficulty in developing a realistic and agreed set of indicators due to the very nature of the industry; the number of indicators necessary to be a complete picture, and lend relevance and accuracy to the overall result will be very large; the difficulty in collecting and processing the required raw data for estimating the indicators, especially in developing countries; and the need to amend or adapt these criteria and indicators for each country and, even project situation due to the dynamic nature of the factors in operation in the construction industry. At the core of these problems is the fact that most of the existing models emphasise the use of lagging measures instead of leading measures. Worse, they do not emphasise continuous assessment of the project, and finally, these models do not pay attention to needs of the clients as initiators of theproject.This research purposed to pre-empt the need for undertaking construction project performance in Ghana based on relevant indicators, as a means of helping to bring about improvements in project executions. Focusing on Ghana, a developing country, this thesis aims at providing a framework within which the industry can learn from best practices elsewhere. Specifically, this thesis provides a means by which construction project performance could be continuously assessed with measures that reflect the perspectives of both practitioners and clients. It also takes into consideration the particular circumstances of the project. In addressing the problems, it was necessary to work within a paradigm shift in the following regard: (i) moving away from expecting "project autopsy reports" towards "project health reports" (ii) moving away from the considering the outcomes of a project in terms ofsuccess/failure ichotomy into project performance results in identifiable criteria (iii) acknowledging the uniqueness of every project and the contingency factors which calls for contingency measures of assessment. Further, this thesis adopted the concept of the project as a ‘temporary organization’. This enabled the adoptions of the relevant organisational theories and improved practices from the business world into the project situation. Finally, the clients’ perspective of project performance was considered. Thus, the research builds on the existing performance measurement frameworks (including success/failure measurements) to develop a contingency- based model for assessing construction projects in Ghana, using multiple measures. Undertaking three sets of empirical research in Ghana within a space of eighteen months with practitioners and clients simultaneously, it was possible to determine the measures that currently reflect practitioners’ views on project performance on one hand and those of the clients on the other. Together, the thesis showed how these measures represent a shared perspective of project performance in Ghana. Based on the above results, a contingency-based assessment tool was designed which could be used to assess construction project performance throughout its life cycle. This tool will allow the identification of factors at play and provides information that will facilitate project management decision. Above all, the tool documents all relevant occurrences and documentations of challenges and decisions which is invaluable for learning and improvements both on the current project and for future projects.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Scheublin, F; van Egmond-de Wilde De Ligny, E and Snijders, C C P |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; contingency; developing country; estimating; key performance indicators; learning; life cycle; monitoring; Ghana; project performance; measurement; construction project; best practice; documentation; client; critical success factor |
| Index terms: | construction project, practitioner, documents, critical success factor, estimating, developing country, economic development, accuracy, documentation, best practice, paradigm, monitoring, project performance, construction industry, modelling, project management, efficiency, performance measurement, key performance indicator, life cycle, temporary organization, Ghana |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, production management, Geography, organizational theory, development economics, professional development, project management theory and practice, economic development, education and knowledge transfer, performance measurement, performance management, financial and cost management, project delivery, analytical methods, value management, control systems, practitioner, business |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, International Construction, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here