Lee, S H (2009) Computational fieldwork support for efficient operation and maintenance of mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Abstract
There is significant potential for improvement in the performance of Operation and Maintenance (O&M) fieldwork. O&M occurs throughout the lifecycle of a building; the majority of expenses in a building's lifecycle are incurred during O&M. Many strategies have been developed to enhance the O&M environment. However, it is well-known that the maintenance industry adapts new technologies more slowly than other industries. Although the industry's O&M support systems have been enhanced considerably, its overall style of O&M fieldwork has remained essentially unchanged for decades. Furthermore, tradespeople, whose primary roles are O&M fieldwork, vastly underutilize information in the field due to problems with information accessibility and reliability. This research investigates current practices from the initial phase of assigning O&M requests through the completion of the requests in order to identify inefficiency in O&M fieldwork and to develop strategies to improve the environment from the perspective of computational support. As the first step, shadowing tradespeople was conducted to better understand current O&M fieldwork and pinpoint bottlenecks in the workflow. Statistical analyses (F-test, Analysis of Variance and R2-Test) were conducted to see the correlation among O&M activities as well as the similarity of the collected data. An Augmented Reality (AR)-based Operation and Maintenance Fieldwork Facilitator (AROMA-FF) is developed to computationally support O&M fieldwork. An O&M information model is developed by enhancing an existing Building Information Model with the data collected from O&M fieldwork practice. An Augmented Reality-based interface is developed for an intuitive user interface. BACnet protocol is used to get sensor-derived operation data in real time from Building Automation Systems. A series of experiments was conducted in order to quantitatively measure improvement in O&M efficiency by using a software prototype of the AR-based O&M Fieldwork Facilitator. The key metric was time spent on O&M activities. The most impressive finding from the experiment is that while the subjects were trying to locate the target area, they spent, on average, 49% less time with the prototype than conventional strategies in addition to an 8% decrease in time spent getting operation-related data. These results show that the prototype is capable of improving O&M fieldwork efficiency.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Akin, O |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accessibility; efficiency; liability; reliability; automation; building information model; lifecycle; operation and maintenance; experiment |
| Index terms: | efficiency, variance, accessibility, new technology, facilitator, statistical analysis, real time, lifecycle, automation, plumbing, operation and maintenance, building automation, liability, strategy, user interface, prototype, experiment, augmented reality, workflow |
| Subjects: | project delivery, data science, innovation and technology management, visualization, modelling and simulation, practitioner, mechanical systems, data collection methods, liability law, human-computer interaction, measurement and scaling, project controls, automation and robotics, maintenance engineering, inclusive design, performance management, management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here