Park, T i (2009) A comprehensive asset management system for sewer infrastructures. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Abstract
As critical components of infrastructure management systems, after enforcement of the Government Accounting Standards Board’s statement 34 (GASB 34), development of a valuation approach and optimal rehabilitation and replacement polices (R&R policies) for infrastructure assets become overriding concerns to governmental agencies. To comply with GASB 34 requirements, governments must report the value of their infrastructures’ assets by using a depreciation method or a modified approach. However, most existing valuation approaches, including these two, do not properly account for the change of assets’ conditions and time-value of money. This may lead to inappropriate asset values, especially for infrastructures that have significantly longer service life than other capital assets. This study proposes an asset valuation model, combined with a Markov chainbased, condition prediction and a regression-based, construction cost index prediction, to capture the change of asset condition and time value of money. The model not only will assist in predicting the future value of the asset but also will play an important role in constructing the optimal R&R policies and the timing of their application. This study also describes the development of a two-step optimization process for R&R policies that include project and network levels optimizations. In project-level optimization, probabilistic dynamic programming analyzes the life cycle cost of a system. In network-level optimization, fuzzy logic theory optimizes the allocation of limited funds and prioritization polices for the infrastructure system. Finally, by describing the potential applicability of the prediction model to real option theory, this study assists government agencies in implementing a comprehensive infrastructure management system to further assist in making satisfactory financial decisions.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Sinha, S K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | optimization; construction cost; replacement; standards; government; infrastructure management; life cycle; programming; rehabilitation; service life; cost index; fuzzy logic; life cycle cost |
| Index terms: | enforcement, real option, dynamic programming, cost index, construction cost, life cycle, fuzzy logic, infrastructure management, service life, replacement, agency, accounting, capital assets, programming, construction cost index, prediction model, life cycle cost, asset management, government agency, sewer |
| Subjects: | research methods, algorithms, health safety and environment, infrastructure engineering, asset management, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, administrative law, programming, materials science, value management, cost indicators, data science, prediction and forecasting, economic analysis, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here