Assessment of the built environment for healthcare: A case study in the development of an evaluation framework

Ruddock, S (2009) Assessment of the built environment for healthcare: A case study in the development of an evaluation framework. PhD thesis, University of Salford, UK.

Abstract

A number of studies (CABE, 2002; Lawson and Phiri, 2005) have shown that good design of healthcare facilities can both benefit patients and raise staff morale. This research focuses on an investigation of patient and staff perceptions of healthcare facilities, particularly with respect to the development of a framework for the evaluation of patient and staff satisfaction with such facilities. Following a comprehensive literature review, two different but interrelated areas of literature, comprising firstly the interrelationship between health and the built environment and secondly the appraisal of healthcare facilities, led to the formation of the research aim, objectives and questions. At the data collection stage, the researcher focused on two existing health centres within Salford PCT as case studies. Existing questionnaires, such as Achieving Excellence Design Evaluation Toolkit (AEDET), were assessed and bespoke questionnaires based on seven groups of features for patients and six groups for staff were developed and piloted. The researcher employed a mixed method approach in the research technique as the data collection process involved two tools: questionnaire and interview. The results of the surveys showed the issues, which most affected users' levels of satisfaction and allowed cross-centre and cross-user group comparisons to be made. Based on the results of the questionnaire surveys, a post-questionnaire factor analysis was undertaken to evaluate and validate the patient questionnaire itself. This resulted in the recommendation, from the findings, that a reconfigured patient questionnaire, based on four factors would best capture the correlated features.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; morale; healthcare; factor analysis; case study; interview; questionnaire survey
Index terms: built environment, factor analysis, investigation, design evaluation, case study, mixed method, satisfaction, morale, questionnaire, toolkit, appraisal, evaluation, interview, survey, literature review, user group
Subjects: project delivery, data analysis and analytics, client relations, design assessment, data collection methods, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, leadership, software systems, factor and component analysis
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Project Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here