Al-Barghouthi, M T (2010) Capturing tacit knowledge in the construction industry in Saudi Arabia. DM thesis, University of Phoenix, USA.
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative method, collective case study design, was to determine if capturing tacit knowledge in Class-I (Saudi Arabian Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs, 2009) construction firms in Saudi Arabia improves construction productivity. The underlying themes of the study were to determine the construction project managers’ awareness of the significance of capturing tacit knowledge, and to determine the effectiveness of capturing tacit knowledge in improving construction productivity. Data were collected by conducting interviews with 10 project managers from 10 different Class-I construction firms in Saudi Arabia. The findings revealed that the participants were unfamiliar with the concept of capturing tacit knowledge. Once the participants understood what capturing tacit knowledge entails, they believed the potential change from capturing tacit knowledge to: (a) improve decision-making, problem-solving, and crisis management, (b) improve work execution methods, (c) reduce activity rework, and (d) provide training, especially for field workers. The participants believed that knowledge flows from top-down and very little in reverse. The participants stated that knowledge management systems could improve their respective firms’ competitive advantage by: (a) providing a platform to document lessons learned, (b) improving the strategic decision-making process for selecting competitive mark-ups, and (c) providing tools to aid the procurement and estimating departments. The findings revealed that the benefits of capturing tacit knowledge were intuitively recognized by the project managers but little, if anything, was done to capture and reuse the site-generated knowledge to improve the participants firms’ competitive advantage.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kealey, D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive advantage; effectiveness; tacit knowledge; construction firms; construction project; crisis management; estimating; knowledge management; mark-up; productivity; reuse; training; project manager; Saudi Arabia; knowledge flow; case study; interview |
| Index terms: | construction industry, construction productivity, crisis management, effectiveness, decision-making process, productivity, platform, Saudi Arabia, project manager, case study, knowledge management system, competitive advantage, knowledge flow, estimating, knowledge management, tacit knowledge, lessons learned, construction project, decision-making, qualitative method, construction firm, rework, mark-up, interview, manager |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, price determination, market analysis, decision analysis, production management, Geography, professional development, financial risk, digital design, management, performance management, knowledge management, financial and cost management, operations management, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, organization, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here