Public-private partnerships: Critical success factors for procurements of capital projects

Amponsah, C T (2010) Public-private partnerships: Critical success factors for procurements of capital projects. PhD thesis, Capella University, USA.

Abstract

The study examines the Critical Success Factors in Public-Private Partnerships (P-P-P) for procurement of capital projects. It identifies factors contributing to the successful procurement of capital projects which is seen as one of the many management practices that contribute to corporate success. The mixed method research comprising qualitative and quantitative survey was used. A case study of the Sea-to-Sky project in British Columbia Canada formed the basis of the study with pre-interviews and post interviews with management of the Sea-to-Sky project. Out of a pool of 705 experts comprising owner, project managers, consultants/contractors, financiers, and operators world-wide, 140 agreed to participate in the survey. Ninety-three participants responded to the survey invitation for a response rate of 70.0%. A model based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process was developed to investigate the Critical Success Factors. A pair-wise comparison was performed on 47 success factors to determine the Critical Success Factors. The top 10 factors that were deduced from the success factors and considered Critical Success Factors are owner satisfaction with the delivered project, clearly defined project mission, objective and scope definitions, adequacy of plans and specifications, lack of legal encumbrances, appropriate funding mechanisms, adequate planning and control techniques, experience of contractor/consultant's team in P-P-P, adherence to schedules/budget/quality/safety/environmental controls, project manager's commitment to establish budget and schedule and effective communication throughout the project. The findings provide those involved in policy development for P-P-P a high level focus on how to ensure successful competitive performance of their organizations.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Forbes, J L
Uncontrolled Keywords: specification; communication; funding; partnership; policy; public-private partnership; consultant; owner; project manager; Canada; critical success factor; analytical hierarchy process; case study; interview
Index terms: analytical hierarchy process, capital project, funding, partnership, owner, Canada, mixed method research, satisfaction, project manager, case study, critical success factor, environmental control, management practice, commitment, success factor, survey, interview, specification
Subjects: psychology, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, project delivery, strategic project management, profession, data collection methods, control systems, sociology, partnership management, environmental engineering, decision-making and optimization, research methods, management, contractual condition, Geography
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here