Awwad, R E (2010) Neutral and risk-sensitive models for competitive bidding methods based on average and order statistics. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, USA.
Abstract
The low bid method has been the most common competitive bid selection approach used for public projects in the U.S. construction industry. This method is usually coupled with a prequalification process to ensure that the lowest bidder has the financial capacity, the necessary experience, and enough bonding capacity to take charge of the project and to perform the work according to the project's requirements. However, driven by their bad financial status or by their urgent need for work, some contractors tend to abuse the free and price-directed competitive nature of the low bid method by deliberately submitting extremely low bid prices in order to enhance their chance of winning and to at least cover their general and administrative expenses. Thus it is possible for the project to be awarded to an accidental or deliberate unrealistic low bid. This often leads to cost overruns, schedule delays, claims and further disputes between parties during construction. This research investigates alternative competitive bidding methods that have the potential to remedy the aforementioned drawback of the low bid method. Monte Carlo simulation approach is used to study and model average-based bidding methods where the winning bid is defined in relation to the average of submitted bids. This research also studies two other competitive bidding methods: the second low bid method where the second lowest bid is awarded the project and the median bid method where the winner is defined to be the median bid. The merits and shortcomings of these methods are analyzed and compared relative to each other and to the low bid method through produced nomograms that depict the winning probability, the optimum markup and the optimum expected profit under each. After studying the aforementioned bidding methods from the perspective of a risk-neutral contractor, this research uses established principles of decision analysis and utility theory to develop a risk-sensitive bidding model that can be applied to each of the studied bidding methods. This model helps a contractor determine his optimal markup for a project given his risk attitude and his uncertainty about the project's estimated and final costs.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ioannou, P G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost overrun; uncertainty; utility theory; bidding; disputes; prequalification; bidding model; decision analysis; probability; Monte Carlo simulation; simulation |
| Index terms: | bidder, statistics, construction industry, schedule delay, dispute, Monte Carlo simulation, cost overrun, decision analysis, public project, bidding, competitive bidding, risk attitude, profit, utility theory |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, infrastructure engineering, decision analysis, project controls, economic theory, industry analysis, mathematical modelling, dispute resolution, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, economic analysis, bidding |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Risk Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here