Dyer, B D (2010) Construction industry productivity: Examining the effects of omitted variable bias in the census construction price index models. PhD thesis, University of Kentucky, USA.
Abstract
A fundamental challenge to the US construction industry is an establishment of an accurate measure of the industry's productivity. Macroeconomic studies have shown a decline in construction productivity (Stokes 1981, BRT 1983, Allen 1985, and Teicholtz 2000), while micro studies have shown an increase (Allmon et al. 2000 and Goodrum et al. 2002). One theory to explain these opposing results might be that current measurements of construction inflation do not adequately consider the change in quality and amenities provided in today's structures as compared to when the measurements were first established. An index that is considered to be one of the industry's major measurements of construction inflation is the U.S. Census Bureau New One-Family Houses under Construction Price Index. This dissertation examines the current hedonic regression model used by the Census Bureau to estimate this price index, which is used to help measure a significant proportion of the industry's real output. This study compares the current hedonic model with a proposed model, which will include quality variables which are not part of Census' current hedonic model. Previous research suggests that omitted quality variables in the Census' price index leads to an omitted variable bias which overestimates construction inflation, leading to both an underestimate of construction industry output and productivity. However, previous research has not formalized necessary changes to the Census index to avoid this bias, nor has the bias been actually measured in order to quantify its direction or magnitude. This study helps to determine the magnitude of the bias, as well as provide a direction for change if needed. KEYWORDS: Real Construction Output, Construction Inflation Indexes, Census Indexes, Construction Quality Measurement, Construction Productivity
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Goodrum, P |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coordination; workforce; construction equipment; construction labor; construction site; equipment; productivity; training; focus group |
| Index terms: | inflation, bias, construction output, construction quality, focus group, hedonic model, construction site, construction labour, coordination, estimate, construction productivity, construction industry, dissertation, construction equipment, regression model, productivity |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, economic analysis, operations management, work location, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, quality assurance, statistical analysis, industry analysis, probability and distributions, construction equipment, management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Plant and Equipment, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here