Forcael, E (2010) Buffering strategies for managing transportation construction projects. PhD thesis, University of Florida, USA.
Abstract
Uncertainty is an inherent part of production systems. In construction processes, production variability emerges as one of the most typical representation of uncertainty. Negative variability impacts in construction demands effective solutions to mitigate its effects on the accomplishment of projects. The incorporation of buffers constitutes powerful tools to resolve uncertainty problems in construction processes and to optimize the construction operations sequencing. Despite the fact that buffering strategies have been implemented in building construction, there is no evidence of specific applications of these strategies in highway projects. Based on discrete event simulation modeling, a new approach of buffering strategies applied to transportation projects is presented. Selection of most relevant buffers is followed by modeling the whole construction process in a transportation construction project, using discrete event simulation. As a part of this modeling process, the localization and size of these buffers will be determined in order to decrease the negative impacts of variability in the construction process. Actual project data will be used as input to validate the model and determine the benefits of buffering strategies in transportation construction projects.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ellis, R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction demand; uncertainty; construction project; highway; simulation |
| Index terms: | construction process, construction project, evidence, production system, building construction, transportation project, strategy, project data, highway construction, construction demand, buffer, modelling, variability, localization, discrete event simulation, construction operation |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, urban planning, analytical methods, construction operations, civil engineering, manufacturing engineering, management, financial risk, production management, building construction, market analysis, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Construction Technology, Governance, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here