Kawecki, L R (2010) Environmental performance of modular fabrication: Calculating the carbon footprint of energy used in the construction of a modular home. PhD thesis, Arizona State University, USA.
Abstract
The construction industry is becoming more aware of its impact on the environment. It has become more sensitive to how it operates and how it can reduce the carbon footprint of the construction process. This research identifies the source of and quantities of the carbon emissions created by an operating modular home fabrication plant in producing, transporting and installing modular structures. This study demonstrates how to measure the carbon footprint created in the production of a modular home. It quantifies and reports the results on a home, on a single module and on a per square foot basis. The primary conclusions of this study are: (a) electricity was found to be the largest energy source used in this fabrication process; (b) the modular fabrication process consumes a significant amount of electrical energy per month; (c) production volume has a bearing on the carbon footprint of each home since the carbon footprint for each period is allocated to every home produced in that period; and (d) transportation of fabricated modules and set-up add to the carbon footprint. Further, a carbon calculator was produced and is included with the study. The tool calculates the impact of energy consumption on the carbon footprint of a modular factory or a modular home. It may be expanded to other process driven fabrication entities. This research is valuable to developers and builders who wish to measure the carbon impact of a modular new home delivery system. The study also provides a methodology for modular home fabricators to measure the carbon footprint of their factories and factory production.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Bashford, H H |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon emissions; carbon footprint; energy consumption; fabrication; modular home; builder; developer |
| Index terms: | becoming, carbon emission, carbon footprint, environmental performance, fabrication, construction industry, module, energy consumption, builder, methodology, energy source, construction process |
| Subjects: | building construction, philosophical process, industry analysis, research methods, manufacturing engineering, sustainability assessment, architectural elements, energy systems, climate science, practitioner, environmental impact |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here