The implications of the UK's counter-terrorism strategy on the construction sector

Due to the threat of terrorism that exists within the UK and internationally, since 2003 the UK has had a strategy for countering international terrorism known as CONTEST, which has been publicly available since 2006 and was updated in March 2009. As part of an ongoing project looking into the systemic implications of counter-terrorism (CT) measures, a review of literature draws attention to major consequences that await the construction sector as a result of UK policy. This reveals that open spaces, unprotected buildings and crowded places are particularly vulnerable so their design and protection through the incorporation of CT measures needs attention. The UK s National Counter Terrorism Security Office is encouraging those responsible for ensuring the protection and resilience of vulnerable buildings and crowded areas to incorporate the use of CT measures. However, it is apparent that there is a lack of investment and buy in from some key stakeholders with responsibility for the development of the built environment. This is due largely to client scepticism about the use of obtrusive and highly visible (and often unattractive) solutions, a lack of informed guidance, differing opinions on the severity of the perceived threat from terrorism and poor awareness of the cost-benefits of such measures. Conclusions drawn state that there are major ramifications for the construction sector if research on the systemic implications of CT measures and their use, cost-effectiveness and ability to enhance resilience through others means, such as sustainability, are not conducted. Moreover, it is likely that the political and social influences and actions resulting from terrorism are beginning to induce fundamental change with regard to the planning, design, management, security and sustainability of the built environment.