Meiling, J (2010) Continuous improvement and experience feedback in off-site construction timber-framed module prefabrication. PhD thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
Abstract
Continuous improvement implies an incremental, ongoing effort to improve products, services or processes. Some construction companies have chosen to face competition by adopting an off-site construction strategy, one form of which is timber-framed module prefabrication. These housebuilders strive to transform their activities from conventional, loosely controlled construction into tightly controlled, continuously improved production processes.The rationale for developing and implementing methods for continuous improvement is well documented. Regardless of the choice of production strategy common denominators are needs to recognise problems and a continuous quality improvement program that incorporates learning from mistakes and success. There is greater scope for such experience feedback in off-site module manufacturing than in on-site construction, because there are higher levels of repetition and process control. The purpose of adopting a continuous improvement strategy is to create knowledge that results in improvements aligned with company vision and goals. This thesis presents and discusses a series of studies intended to elucidate the role and status of continuous improvement in Swedish off-site construction. Quantitative and qualitative data have been gathered in six studies of timber-framed module prefabrication companies: three multiple case studies, two questionnaire-based surveys, and one archival analysis. The six studies have investigated building inspection defects, current practice of experience feedback, application of stepwise problemsolving, and Lean management in an off-site construction context. The results show that application of a continuous improvement strategy through stepwise problem solving enables pull for experience feedback in the studied companies. Furthermore, stepwise problem solving can reduce defects, enhance learning and target accuracy when solving problems in module prefabrication. The investigated problems acted as vehicles for experience feedback for both internal and external customers, in a feedback generating loop. Communication was improved as it was demanded by the problem-solving activity. Further work is needed to understand how continuous improvements and the stepwise problem solving methodology could be fully implemented and integrated in working processes in the off-site construction context, in terms of supporting leadership, ensuring availability of resources, building trust among employees, providing challenging work and thus attaining sustainable quality advantages in contrast to short-term benefits. In addition, a sufficient level of standardisation must be applied in off-site construction to gain the benefits of systematic problem solving.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; feedback; off-site; timber; communication; fabrication; leadership; learning; manufacturing; prefabrication; problem solving; production process; builder; employee; housebuilder; competition; continuous improvement; trust; case studies |
| Index terms: | inspection, quality improvement, housebuilder, continuous improvement, case study, production strategy, fabrication, prefabrication, off-site construction, module, standardization, production process, builder, construction company, survey, accuracy, face, strategy, problem solving, questionnaire, competition, process control, program, methodology |
| Subjects: | project delivery, psychology, control systems, practitioner, organization, data collection methods, quality assurance, building construction, market analysis, professional development, decision-making and reasoning, software systems, research methods, performance measurement, management, manufacturing engineering, architectural elements |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here