Development of an integrated framework for satisfaction assessment of construction project teams

Nzekwe-Excel, C (2010) Development of an integrated framework for satisfaction assessment of construction project teams. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, UK.

Abstract

With increasing competitive pressures in today’s market, it has become critical for businesses to recognise the significance of satisfying their customers so as to ensure their economic stability. Various studies have emphasised on the need for customer focus and project satisfaction in the construction industry sector. The industry, however, has not fully embraced the practice of project satisfaction, which is grounded on meeting the needs of the customer. Though most research on project satisfaction has focussed on the client, it is essential that the satisfaction of the project delivery team and in the wider context, the stakeholders be considered. In this case, the client is the centre of gravity of the project team. In order to satisfy the project team, there are challenges in assessing their requirements. This necessitates the need to develop a unique and robust method for capturing and analysing the level of integrated project team satisfaction. In this research, the project delivery team and the stakeholders have been lumped together as an integrated project team. Therefore, integrated project team satisfaction entails recognising the client and project participants' requirements that guarantees project successful completion and acceptance by the team. In view of this, this research presents a framework, which has been developed to plug these needs and challenges. The framework, known as the satisfaction assessment integrated framework (SAIF), involves an integrated approach that considers the participants of a construction project as a tree structure, and each member of that tree as an intermediate or top element. Relationships and interactions of the elements, and how these affect the overall satisfaction levels of a single project, are analysed based on understanding their requirements and invoking modern satisfaction attainment theory. The framework includes a method for understanding and identifying the satisfaction attributes; multi-attribute analysis for prioritising the satisfaction attributes of the clients and project participants; fault tree analysis strategy for defining the satisfaction relationship in a particular project team; and an assessment scoring system (a combination of multi-attribute analysis, and failure mode and effects analysis methodical approach) that evaluates how much each member of the project team meets the requirements or satisfaction attributes of other participants. Hence, SAIF, a novel assessment methodology, investigates and identifies possible links and the influence of integrating the construction project team and their satisfaction attributes with the aim of improving their satisfaction levels as a team. Through the findings of this research, recommendations are made to further explore the implications of satisfying a given participant against dissatisfying the participant; and subsequently improve the satisfaction assessment process.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: client; customer satisfaction; fault tree analysis; project team integration; prototype development; stakeholder satisfaction
Index terms: guarantee, integrated approach, strategy, stability, failure mode and effects analysis, prototype, fault-tree analysis, construction project, multi-attribute analysis, integration, methodology, construction project team, satisfaction, prioritizing, customer satisfaction, stakeholder satisfaction, project team, project delivery, interaction, construction industry
Subjects: organizational analysis, decision analysis, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, management, contract structure, structural engineering, research methods, production management, service delivery, modelling and simulation, participation process, contractual arrangements, project delivery, risk management, reliability engineering
Topics: Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here