Arab, M Z M (2011) A function-based cost model for early cost advice on new-build schools projects. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.
Abstract
Establishing a reliable budget estimate based on limited information at the briefing stage of a construction project is a challenge for any client and design team. Unreliable estimates based on ill defined client needs and wants are all too frequent in practice (Newton 1991; Akintoye & Fitzgerald, 2000; Longmaid, 2003; Sonmez, 2004; Elahg et al., 2005 and Aibinu & Pasco, 2008). A review of the literature revealed a lack of accuracy of current cost estimation methods as a consequence of limited design information available at the conceptual stage. The focus of the investigation was newbuild school projects and, though much published design guidance on schools is available, there is little or no specific construction cost estimation guidance. Previous studies have not considered how the richness of information that is available at the briefing stage might inform cost estimates. The main purpose of the study, therefore, was to develop a function-based cost model for application at the briefing stage of school projects to estimate cost prior to the technical design phase. Exploring the current briefing practices and available design guidance breadth of school projects and consulting the various UK council representatives revealed eighty eight design and engineering requirements as the initial basis of the cost model. The model developed uses the identified functional requirements to prepare a cost estimate that does not rely on technical design information. The research approach adopted was a mixed methodology combining qualitative and quantitative data collection. Initially, a qualitative survey of the various UK councils involved in the delivery of new-build school projects was conducted to investigate the current practices of briefing and costing new school projects. A quantitative study was then undertaken to determine the various general design and engineering requirements asked by the school clients. Finally, another quantitative survey was employed to establish the various levels of performances which the existing UK school buildings achieve for the distilled requirements. Regression analysis was used to develop the proposed cost model using all the information which would be available at the briefing stage. The study showed that clearly identifying all client requirements, determined at the briefing stage in predicting the project cost, would enhance the accuracy level of the model. Conversely, neglecting any part of briefing information would reduce the reliability and accuracy of estimates. The function-based cost model was developed and iii validated within the school projects sector. The cost model would estimate the cost of new-build projects accurately relying only on clients' design and engineering requirements sought at the briefing stage. The cost model provides a decision aid for the client which, if developed and applied, could be used at the briefing and technical design stage of school projects in evaluating the affordability of alternative options.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; briefing; client; liability; newbuild; regression analysis; schools; UK |
| Index terms: | design team, project cost, accuracy, survey, liability, cost estimating, briefing, affordability, methodology, construction project, school building, cost model, design stage, construction cost, estimation, cost estimate, estimate, costing, option, regression analysis, design phase, client requirements, investigation |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, liability law, decision analysis, production management, professional development, economics, accounting and finance, research methods, professional practice, economic analysis, financial and cost management, scope management, construction type, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Risk Management, Project Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here