Azimi, R (2011) An integrated real-time control system for structural steel fabrication projects. PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
Off-site structural steel fabrication has become increasingly popular in industrial construction projects over the past decade due to advantages of higher productivity, better quality, better safety and improved time and cost effectiveness. The fast paced nature of off-site structural steel fabrication environments, constraints induced by the construction site, and the existing limitations within the shop, make the control process of off-site construction quite challenging. Successful delivery of off-site structural steel fabrication projects requires a reliable monitoring and control system. A key factor for the success and effectiveness of such a system is its ability to perform real-time monitoring and to evaluate and analyze project performance fast enough so that in the case of deviation the appropriate corrective actions can be taken in a timely manner. New achievements in automated data capturing systems and computer simulation techniques provide a reliable platform for effective project monitoring and control, as they can respectively reduce the time required to obtain as-built data and simulate different scenarios for possible corrective actions ahead of time. The functionality of control systems can be greatly increased by integrating these two techniques; however, such a feasibility has not been examined in great detail. The primary objective of this research is to address this issue by proposing a framework for new generation of project monitoring and control systems focusing on integrating automated data acquisition systems and computer simulation techniques that could be a robust decision support tool for project managers. The second objective of this research is enhancing control process in the dynamic environments of off-site construction shops based on the control theory concept. The proposed method makes project managers capable of prompt non-linear data analysis and of predicting the behavior of the performance of the off-site construction fabrication shops. This leads to promptly determining the best corrective action in the case of variance to achieve the desired performance of the shop with minimum cost. To illustrate the feasibility and practicality of the proposed framework and enhanced project control method, they were successfully implemented in an actual off-site structural steel fabrication shop.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | AbouRizk, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | control system; decision support; effectiveness; construction project; construction site; fabrication; monitoring; off-site construction; productivity; project control; safety; project manager; project performance; simulation |
| Index terms: | deviation, productivity, platform, project manager, variance, project control, fabrication, industrial construction, off-site construction, project performance, effectiveness, monitoring, functionality, construction site, computer simulation, data analysis, decision support, cost-effectivenes, data acquisition system, time control, project monitoring, control system, construction project |
| Subjects: | building construction, decision analysis, measurement and scaling, data management, project controls, economics, performance management, management, manufacturing engineering, digital design, project management theory and practice, monitoring and control, production management, work location, design features, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, profession, control systems |
| Topics: | Time Control, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here