An appraisal of the performance of a 'green' office building

Birchall, S J (2011) An appraisal of the performance of a 'green' office building. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.

Abstract

The challenges of a 'greener' future are now a responsibility for everyone and particularly for the built environment, where sustainable building design is no longer an innovative option but more of a legislative must. Unfortunately significant differences are often found between the design and measured performance of buildings, with many factors contributing towards these discrepancies. This thesis investigates, using Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) techniques, the credibility gap between design and measured performance of a partially occupied 'green' office building selected as the case study. The results found that the measured energy consumption was over three times the design estimates, and the performance compared poorly against good practice benchmarks for similar buildings. The study's POE also revealed inefficient control settings, high out-of-hours energy consumption and ineffective building management. This study goes beyond a typical POE as it also includes investigations into how the occupancy variations, and the management strategies applied under these conditions, can impact on building energy performance through the use of simulation modelling techniques. This is an area where very little research has previously been carried out. At the current 50% occupancy levels, potential annual savings of over £30,000 in utility bills and 60% in energy consumption were estimated if more effective management and control was implemented. Social-related aspects of building performance are also investigated. Occupant surveys were conducted and the results were compared to previous findings. The perceived comfort and satisfaction with temperature was the most disappointing finding from the survey, however overall the building was comparable to the average benchmarks, but did not perform well when compared to other green office buildings. The study revealed that there is potential for the building to be fine-tuned to perform more efficiently than it currently is, however there must be suitably skilled Facility Management to ensure this is delivered.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Tinker, J
Uncontrolled Keywords: building design; built environment; energy consumption; evaluation; occupancy; performance; sustainable building; valuation; variations; case study; simulation; energy performance
Index terms: built environment, investigation, comfort, simulation modelling, energy consumption, option, estimate, energy performance, case study, satisfaction, management strategy, building design, savings, office building, good practice, post-occupancy evaluation, green office, sustainable building, sustainable building design, variation, appraisal, building management, occupant survey, survey, building performance
Subjects: decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, quality assurance, infrastructure and transport systems, factor and component analysis, performance measurement, management, design practice, sustainable construction, contractual condition, economic analysis, architectural design, evaluation methods, financial and cost management, project delivery, analytical methods, energy systems, construction type, data collection methods
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here