Dare, F T (2011) A novel methodology for e-learning space design in HEI campuses. PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, UK.
Abstract
The Higher Education Institution and the Construction Industry are yet to define the most appropriate and effective design parameters for E-learning spaces. Those which exist, focus mainly on cost, budget and timely delivery i.e. the process only not the product. An effective approach to E-learning space design is needed to address the problems of space efficiency, effectiveness, quality, innovativeness, performance and client satisfaction. This study aimed to develop a novel methodology for e-learning space design, by investigating: the impact of e-learning on facilities and design; the impact of e-learning on the design of future spaces; the impact of blended learning on space design; designing for the learn anytime, anywhere paradigm; security issues of e-learning and e-learning space design, the levels of design risk in an e-learning infrastructure and inclusive design issues. A Grounded theory approach was used during initial desk studies, synchronized with a three part forum and pilot survey of 33participants. From this process, two hypotheses emerged; firstly, e-learning space design could affect users‘ learning outcomes and secondly that; user‘s learning requirements were different and varied. To investigate further, site based analyses of 11 HEI‘s, 10 interviews and subsequently a questionnaire survey was administered. Users‘ and stakeholders requirements and good examples of e-learning space design were identified. Data were analysed using a mixed-method research design approach. Three main constructs, Space design, Technology and the E-learning Space Design research focus (ELSD focus), emerged as significant components in the development of a novel framework for the design of e-learning spaces. The relationship between the components is such that the design of spaces with consideration of the ELSD research focus would ensure the effective identification, interpretation and delivery of users‘ requirement while maximising the benefits of the adoption of appropriate technology within HEI facilities. This was therefore proposed as the realistic framework/model for future design of E- learning Spaces in HEI campuses. The framework was adapted into a conceptual design guide to provide guidance for future space design. It is expected the study will support the HEI sector globally as it moves towards achieving best practice solutions to future E-learning space design in HEI campuses.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Mushatat, S A L |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best practice; client satisfaction; e-learning; grounded theory; higher education; infrastructure; interview; learning; questionnaire survey; security; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | survey, interview, inclusive design, appropriate technology, conceptual design, questionnaire, design risk, e-learning, methodology, higher education, grounded theory, learning space, research design, design parameter, higher education institution, efficiency, learning outcome, construction industry, client satisfaction, effectiveness, best practice, paradigm |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, student development, design constraints, educational institutions, financial risk, educational technology, design practice, education and knowledge transfer, theoretical framing, research methods, performance management, design methods, data collection methods, technological development, construction type, business, research design and methodology, client relations |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Sustainability, Quality Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here