Glass, A (2011) Analysis of building-integrated renewable energy systems in modern UK homes. EngD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Driven by climate change and the impending depletion of fossil fuels, the UK Government has set the great challenge to UK builders to produce zero-carbon homes as of 2016. Due to a lack of experience the merits of integrating onsite micro renewable energy systems were largely unknown. Barratt Development PLC, UK's largest builder, set out in 2006 to investigate how these new building regulations can best be tackled. The key points to be investigated are: how much CO2 can be offset using renewable energy systems in standard homes and at what cost; how reliable are these systems; and how can their performance be improved? At the EcoSmart village several systems were tested under realistic conditions, including PV, Solar Thermal, Micro Wind Turbines, GSHPs and microCHP. The systems were tested over a 12-month period, integrated into standard Barratt homes, and running under near real-life conditions. Data was recorded from the test-site, including heat and electrical energy generation and consumption, temperature data and weather data. This data was used to establish the theoretical performance of the systems at the test site, and by doing so simple methods were found and tested that can be used by builders or architects to gain a better understanding of the expected performance of a particular system. The estimated energy generation was then compared to the measured performance. Detailed modelling and analysis of observations was carried out to provide explanations for any discrepancies, and based on this general recommendations were made on how the performance of the systems could be improved. Given the commercial drivers behind carrying out this research project, a high emphasis was given to financial implications of installing the systems. For this purpose payback periods and life-time savings were estimated, based on measured performance and other influences such as feed-in tariffs. This was also done for embodied energy and embodied carbon, as this will ultimately determine how the systems can help to fulfil the purpose of Government legislation, which is to reduce the carbon footprint of the UK domestic sector.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Levermore, G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building regulation; carbon footprint; climate; climate change; commercial; fossil fuel; government; homes; legislation; new build; performance; renewable energy; regulation; architects; builder; UK; weather |
| Index terms: | new build, regulation, modelling, depletion, legislation, architect, fossil fuel, climate change, onsite, consumption, payback, building regulation, embodied carbon, time saving, renewable energy, builder, weather, renewable energy system, embodied energy, carbon footprint |
| Subjects: | practitioner, climate science, environmental resource management, time analysis, construction integration, regulatory law, building construction, air quality, profession, consumer economics, analytical methods, economic analysis, environmental impact, legal systems, energy systems, political science |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Governance, Time Control, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here