Fageha, M K and Aibinu, A A (2014) Prioritising project scope definition elements in public building projects. Construction Economics and Building, 14(3), pp. 18-33. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
A complete definition of the scope of a project upfront during early stages ensures smooth and successful implementation during the project execution. This research identifies and prioritises project scope definition elements for public buildings in Saudi Arabia. Elements that could significantly contribute to complete project scope definition package at pre-project planning stage are identified and their interrelationship determined and prioritised. Using the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) as a basis, the study uses analytical network process (ANP) technique based on data obtained from project managers who have been involved in public sector projects in Saudi Arabia. Data collection and analysis was conducted in three steps. The first step involved identification of scope definition elements while the second involved an investigation into interrelationships among the elements. In the third step, ANP was used to determine the weight of the elements' importance in terms of contribution to project scope definition completeness. Finally, Pareto analysis was used to prioritise and assess the distribution pattern of the elements. The outcome from this research is the prioritisation of project scope definition elements for public building projects in Saudi Arabia. The prioritised list developed indicates the importance of project scope definition elements. It should help project management teams identify elements to consider when evaluating project scope definition for completeness at the pre-project planning stage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytical network process; pre-project planning; prioritising; project scope definition; public building projects; Saudi Arabia |
| Index terms: | project scope definition, investigation, prioritizing, package, public sector, Saudi Arabia, project management team, pareto analysis, public building, implementation, project manager, project planning |
| Subjects: | scope management, decision analysis, control systems, contractual arrangements, construction type, administrative law, profession, Geography, data collection methods, quality control |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Project Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here