Zhang, M (2011) Uncertainty and imprecision in safety assessment of offshore structures. PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Non-deterministic phenomena unavoidably exist in offshore engineering practice and the available information to engineers regarding these phenomena is frequently not certain or precise but rather characterized with uncertainty and/or imprecision. This complicates an appropriate mathematical modeling and the associated engineering analysis required to derive reliable evaluations of structural performance and safety. This thesis aims to explore a realistic modeling of the available information regarding marine corrosion and marine growth in the complex ocean environment, and develop efficient computational procedures for an adequate processing of the information through safety assessment of offshore structures. Non-probabilistic models and the concept of imprecise probabilities are utilized in the modeling of marine corrosion and marine growth effects due to scarce and imprecise information. These effects on offshore structural reliability, robustness and damage detection, have been captured in the computational results, such as the probability of failure, robustness measures and the detected damage, through the developed procedures with high efficiency and accuracy. More reliable engineering decisions concerning the safety conditions of offshore structures can be achieved based on the computational results. Furthermore, it shows that these mathematical concepts in modeling of uncertainty and imprecision possess certain advantages in the case of limited information and associated difficulties of a traditional probabilistic modeling.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ghee, K C |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; failure; reliability; uncertainty; corrosion; offshore engineering; safety; probability |
| Index terms: | efficiency, engineer, mathematical modelling, structural reliability, modelling, ocean environment, offshore engineering, accuracy, corrosion |
| Subjects: | reliability engineering, environmental science, analytical methods, professional development, performance management, infrastructure and transport systems, profession, material degradation and durability |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here