Forsythe, P and Ding, G (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions from excavation on residential construction sites. Construction Economics and Building, 14(4), pp. 1-10. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Despite considerable research concerning the manifestation of greenhouse gases in the usage of buildings, little has been done concerning emissions arising from the construction process itself. This paper specifically examines emissions arising from cut and fill excavation on residential construction sites. Even though such excavation is often seen as being economical in terms of providing a flat base for concrete raft slab construction, the environmental consequences of this approach need to be considered more fully in terms of impact on the environment. This is particularly important when steeply sloping sites are involved and for different soil types. The paper undertakes a study that quantitatively assesses the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions caused by cut and fill excavation on 52 residential projects in Australia for a range of slope and soil types. The paper presents results from the study and concludes that greenhouse gas emissions increase as site slope increases; the building footprint area (as distinct from Gross Floor Area), exposes the need to reduce the area of the building to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; excavation of rock soils creates higher emissions than other soil types; and cut and fill excavation on steeply slope sites increase emissions. Potential alternative construction includes suspended floor construction systems which involve less excavation. Perry Forsythe and Grace Ding.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | excavation; floor construction; greenhouse gases; life-cycle analysis; residential construction |
| Index terms: | construction system, construction process, slope, gross floor area, greenhouse gas emission, excavation, slab construction, greenhouse gas, Australia, residential construction, residential project |
| Subjects: | economic development, building construction, construction operations, Geography, environmental health, climate science, building performance, construction integration, geotechnical engineering |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here