Dong, N (2012) Automated look-ahead schedule generation and optimization for the finishing phase of complex construction projects. PhD thesis, Stanford University, USA.
Abstract
In the project this dissertation describes, I have developed an integrated approach to quickly generate accurate and close-to-optimum LASs in the finishing phase of complex construction projects. In the finishing phase of such projects, project planners, site engineers, and construction engineers struggle to use look-ahead schedules (LASs) to effectively organize and allocate limited project resources such as crews and spaces on a daily basis for three main reasons. First, the LASs created are error-prone because site engineers and project planners need to consider constraints including precedence constraints, spatial and crew availabilities, and engineering constraints, such as zone and blocking constraints; second, the LAS generation process is time-consuming, even with the help of the existing commercial tools; and third, there is no way to tell whether the LASs created are the best means by which to achieve specific project goals, such as shortest construction duration and lowest construction cost. The approach I have developed builds on two theoretical foundations: automated schedule generation and project schedule optimization. This approach consists of an automated LAS generation (ALASG) method and an optimization method based on a genetic algorithm (GA). The ALASG method can quickly generate one accurate LAS. The ALASG method is composed of an information model that integrates the project data sources at the appropriate level of detail to facilitate the formation of operations and the accommodation of constraints, and an LAS generation process model that sequences operations without violating any constraints. The GA-based optimization method interacts with the ALASG method to quickly discover nearly optimum LASs. I have also developed a prototype based on this approach. The results from the use of this prototype in student and engineer design charrettes and from comparison studies provide evidence for the power of this approach in rapidly generating accurate and close-to-optimum LASs. Because of this unique capability, I claim the ALASG method as a contribution to the field of automated schedule generation and the GA-based method as a contribution to the field of project schedule optimization. This research lays the foundation for tools that can guide project planners, site engineers, and construction managers to effectively and efficiently conduct work assignments by (1) eliminating work conflict and rework, (2) always looking towards optimum project goals, and (3) quickly adjusting project actions according to the most up-to-date project status.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Fischer, M; Ge, D and Levitt, R E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | duration; optimization; construction cost; construction project; foundations |
| Index terms: | dissertation, foundations, duration, planner, construction cost, engineer, charrette, evidence, construction manager, construction project, rework, project data, prototype, level of detail, genetic algorithm, integrated approach |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, technical documentation, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, project controls, research dissemination and communication, evaluation and assessment methods, operations management, contractual arrangements, structural engineering, algorithms, production management, design process |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Time Control, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here