Manzoni, B; Morris, P and Smyth, H (2009) Equipping project teams to win tenders: An insight into Italian architecture projects. In: Dainty, A R J (ed.) Proceedings of 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
Project group structures are a typical configuration in the architecture industry, used as a way to cope with a dilemma typical of architectural firms, caught between artistic and efficiency drivers. Moreover teams are the mechanism these organisations often rely on to be more effective. Nonetheless, the role of team composition for project performance has not been systematically studied yet. The relationship between team composition and performance in competing for tenders for design in architecture projects is therefore explored, investigating what team composition leads to superior performance and how performance induces feedback on team design. Team composition is seen in terms of members' newness (old-timers/newcomers), nationality (national/international) and reputation (archistars/common professionals), while project's performance in terms of tender's result. Italian architectural competitions and tenders from 2004 to 2008 are used as a research setting. For each team submitting a project to a competition, data concerning performance, competition and team s characteristics are collected and a regression method will be used to analyse them. Interviews integrate the quantitative analysis. At this stage the research is predominantly literature review based but it will contribute to understand whether and how team composition in architecture impacts on tenders performance. Moreover it will provide a macro overview of the tenders scenario and of the architects labour market and it will present a unique insight into the Italian architecture industry.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; tendering; business strategy; practice management; project management |
| Index terms: | project management, practice management, efficiency, project team, architectural competition, architectural firm, configuration, quantitative analysis, literature review, competition, project performance, business strategy, labour market, architect, team composition, interview |
| Subjects: | tendering, market analysis, business, project management theory and practice, data collection methods, economics, profession, data analysis and analytics, performance management, systems engineering, management, project delivery |
| Topics: | Project Management, Supply Chain Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here