Jordan, E (2012) Pathways to community recovery: A qualitative comparative analysis of post-disaster outcomes. PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA.
Abstract
Despite efforts to improve community resilience to disasters, over the past 25 years the number and economic impact of disasters has increased each year. The rising number of disasters in developing countries is of particular concern because disaster losses and the required recovery efforts may delay development investments. Due to the complexities of disaster recovery, an interdisciplinary perspective is important in assessing recovery outcomes. In addition, while previous studies have established that communities have varying levels of vulnerability and resilience, there has been little research into how such conditions enable a community to recover after a disaster. Understanding the conditions that lead to recovery is fundamental to improving a community's ability to recover after a disaster. Unfortunately, due to the depth of knowledge required for qualitative disaster recovery studies, there have been few cross-case comparative studies in which researchers link causal conditions to post-disaster recovery. This research transforms our understanding of recovery through a cross-case comparison of what pre-disaster factors and recovery strategies (combined or in isolation) lead to successful post-disaster recovery. Specifically, this research (1) identified recovery indicators and important causal conditions for community recovery across multiple disciplinary perspectives (2) measured causal conditions and recovery indicators for villages in India affected by the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami; and (3) used qualitative comparative analysis to determine what combinations of conditions led to recovery in the case study communities. This dissertation contributes to a better understanding of why communities recover differently from disasters and the pathways that lead to different recovery outcomes. The results of this study will allow community planners to prioritize and focus their efforts on the conditions that best strengthen the community's ability to recover from a disaster. It also contributes to the development of a disaster recovery framework which can be expanded through future research.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Javernick-Will, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | economic impact; developing countries; disaster recovery; investment; India; qualitative comparative analysis; case study |
| Index terms: | economic impact, vulnerability, complexity, cross-case comparison, developing country, disaster recovery, qualitative comparative analysis, strategy, tsunami, planner, comparative study, post-disaster recovery, India, dissertation, case study, community resilience, recovery |
| Subjects: | operations management, research dissemination and communication, environmental hazards, financial analysis, Geography, development economics, social equity, research methods, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, profession, research design and methodology, systems engineering, emergency and crisis management, management, post-disaster and reconstruction |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, International Construction, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here