Martin, L and Root, D (2009) Knowledge creation in construction: The seci model. In: Dainty, A R J (ed.) Proceedings of 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
Creation of knowledge and the management thereof is of great importance if industry players are to survive in competitive environments. The Socialisation-Externalisation-Combination-Internalisation (SECI) model of Nonaka is one theoretical model of how tacit and explicit knowledge is processed within organisations. Research on knowledge creation in Construction Management (CM) has made reference to the SECI model, yet its applicability is not without criticism. Through a structured review of journals based in the CM domain the application of the SECI model to construction enterprises, as well its acceptability is explored. Drawing from this review, arguments for and against the adoption of the model are presented and contextualised with critique from mainstream management research. The review thus provides the basis for judging the applicability and merits of the SECI model in Knowledge management research; and more specifically reference to knowledge dealing with CM related issues and how the SECI model can adequately be employed here.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | knowledge creation; learning; review |
| Index terms: | knowledge management, knowledge creation, explicit knowledge, management research, drawing, critique, journal |
| Subjects: | professional development, research design and methodology, research dissemination and communication, evaluation and assessment methods, technical documentation, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here