Managing sustainability value in design: A systems approach

Novak, V M (2012) Managing sustainability value in design: A systems approach. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.

Abstract

The aim of the research is to identify core conditions that support increased delivery of sustainability in the built environment. The selected methodology is constructive research, which is distinguished by the dual focus on practical industry perspectives and theoretical knowledge. The first research question examines how Target Value Design (TVD), an integrated design management process, can elicit better delivery of sustainability values. This is developed through case study research of an exemplary design team and project. The findings identify a gap in the capability of the team to adopt a whole systems approach in order to make explicit the values of sustainable prosperity and develop a unified vision. This provides the basis for the second research question - how can design teams gain an understanding of the systemic nature of sustainability, and how can this understanding impact the design process? The research proposes an intervention method that aligns learning models from the disciplines of experiential learning cycles, design thinking, behavior modeling, systems thinking and unified vision. This integrated approach leverages creative design activities to capture the learning potential for individual skills and team building. While the research acknowledges the limitations from the testing of a single workshop experiment, post-workshop data suggests the intervention framework is sufficiently robust and versatile enough to adapt to individual workshop circumstances. The key research outcome is the importance of the people in the process of collaborative design, in their ability to envision a future state of sustainable prosperity and articulate explicit actionable values.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Fiori, C M and Garvin, M J
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; skills; sustainability; systems thinking; collaborative design; design management; experiential learning; learning; experiment; case study
Index terms: design management, methodology, collaborative design, integrated approach, experiential learning, design process, design management process, systems thinking, design team, experiment, built environment, modelling, testing, target value design, team building, case study, workshop
Subjects: design methods, learning methods, value management, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, management, analytical methods, professional practice, contractual arrangements, organization, construction type, design process, research methods
Topics: Cost Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Education
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here