Yoon, Y J (2012) Planning of optimal rehabilitation strategies for infrastructure using time float and multiyear prioritization approach. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.
Abstract
Constant monitoring, maintenance and repair activities are needed in order to maintain the infrastructure systems in good condition and extend their service lives. However, maintenance and repair activities alone cannot prevent continuous deterioration of infrastructure systems so that a rehabilitation strategy should be developed. There have been many efforts to determine the optimal rehabilitation time for infrastructure systems using the various optimization models (e.g., project level, network level, or a combination of both that is a combined level). In particular, the optimization models at the network and combined levels require prioritization approaches (e.g., single year, multiyear, or yearly-based multiyear analysis) to prioritize and screen rehabilitation projects within the available budgets. Recent research and practice focus on developing optimization models on the basis of the integration of the project and network level analysis over a long-term budgetary goal. However, they still have limitations as rehabilitation planning models due to: 1) the use of the fixed rehabilitation time identified during the project level analysis leading to decisions that are not optimal at the network level, 2) no consideration of the rehabilitation projects that are not selected within the multiyear prioritization approach due to limited budget, and 3) incompatibility of the required annual rehabilitation cost and the purpose of a multiyear budget approach, i.e. , to ensure the predictability of rehabilitation needs. This research suggests a new paradigm for efficient infrastructure management to overcome those challenges. That is, infrastructure management strategy should be established based on the rehabilitation time float and an annual reanalysis process within the context of maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) over a multiyear period. The rehabilitation time float is defined as the acceptable time frame within which a rehabilitation project can be accommodated to develop a leveled annual rehabilitation requirement cost over a multiyear analysis period. Therefore, the research methodology consists of four processes: 1) identification of the best MR&R strategy at the project level, 2) estimation of the time float of rehabilitation projects and development of cost leveling method, 3) multiyear analysis to find an optimal set of rehabilitation projects at the network level, and 4) annual reanalysis for the selection of final rehabilitation projects at a target fiscal year. To demonstrate the research methodology, this dissertation uses concrete bridge decks as a case study in the state of Indiana. The required data was obtained from the national bridge inventory (NBI) database. The suggested multiyear infrastructure rehabilitation strategy using the new paradigm could help public agencies do the following: (a) Identify leveled annual rehabilitation costs that are required to keep the infrastructure systems in good condition. (b) Establish a long-term and steady budgetary goal for rehabilitation programs. (c) Make a more reliable decision for a multiyear rehabilitation program.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Hastak, M |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | optimization; inventory; deterioration; infrastructure management; integration; monitoring; rehabilitation; India; case study |
| Index terms: | strategy, deterioration, rehabilitation project, repair, agency, integration, program, database, estimation, case study, infrastructure management, inventory, concrete bridge, India, dissertation, research methodology, paradigm, monitoring |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, data management, health conditions and diseases, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, education and knowledge transfer, management, software systems, financial and cost management, material degradation and durability, data collection methods, research design and methodology, control systems, maintenance engineering, Geography, inventory management, infrastructure engineering, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Supply Chain Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here