The impact of contractors' attributes on construction project success

Al-Zahrani, J I (2013) The impact of contractors' attributes on construction project success. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the most significant industrial contributors to the economy in terms of gross product and employment. As a result, the success of a construction project is a fundamental issue to most governments, users and communities. The thesis addresses the role of the contractor in construction project success as one of the main stakeholders in the project.The research aims to study the impact of contractors' attributes on project success from a post-construction evaluation perspective to identify what goes right and to recognise the most critical success factors (CSFs) of contractors that greatly impact on project success and link those factors to project success objectives. Initially, a literature review on construction project success was conducted to investigate the success criteria and CSFs of contractors in project success. This was followed by a survey to establish construction professionals' perceptions of the CSFs of contractors that greatly impact on the success of construction projects.One hundred and sixty-four (164) completed surveys were returned, representing a 32% response rate. The data gathered was analysed using quantitative analysis tools (SPSS). Factor analysis reveals nine underlying clusters perceived to greatly impact the success of projects, namely: (i) health, safety and quality; (ii) past performance; (iii) environment; (iv) management and technical aspects; (v) resource; (vi) organisation; (vii) experience; (viii) size/type of previous projects; and (ix) finance.Four logistic regression and artificial neural network models were developed to predict the most important contractor factors associated with project success. The predictive ability of neural network models outperforms that of logistic models by 47.5% for scheduling model; 34.8% for budget model; 46.2% for quality model; and 46.5% for contractors' impact model. Assuming that project success is repeatable, these findings provide a clear understanding of contractors' performance and could potentially enhance existing knowledge of construction project success.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Emsley, M
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial neural network; construction project; critical success factor; employment; evaluation; factor analysis; government; neural network; professional; project success; quantitative analysis; safety; scheduling; stakeholders
Index terms: construction project, critical success factor, quantitative analysis, success criteria, scheduling, neural network, literature review, survey, artificial neural network, construction professional, factor analysis, construction industry, project success, logistic regression, employment
Subjects: operations research, assessment methods, production management, modelling and simulation, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, control systems, industry analysis, statistical analysis, management, professional development, project management theory and practice
Topics: Project Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Research Practice, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here