Ness, K (2009) Not just about bricks: The invisible building worker. In: Dainty, A R J (ed.) Proceedings of 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
The solution to the construction industry's 'image problem' is sometimes said to lie in explaining that building is 'not just about bricks'. This paper reflects upon the seeming 'invisibility', both in the industry and in academic work, of those who do the physical work of construction. Contractors increasingly delegate responsibilities for employment down multi-layered supply chains; training and development are largely confined to core professional/managerial staff. Building workers are increasingly marginalised in discourses which seek to constitute the construction industry as 'modern and high-tech', and the work as part of the 'knowledge economy'. With some notable exceptions, academic research tends to focus on professional and managerial staff rather than manual workers. Thus, arguably, research may fail to question fundamental assumptions, and to investigate the full range of people's experience in the construction industry. The embodied skills of craft workers are devalued by comparison with the more cerebral knowledge of professionals. Thus, firms cut themselves off from their knowledge base, workers have less opportunity to advance, and the industry continues to have an image problem . Construction management (CM) is founded on appropriating the knowledge of the craft worker, as what was previously craft knowledge becomes management knowledge. Professional institutions seek to dissociate CM from mere building. Institutions of higher education play a large part in this, controlling access by exams and tests. Academic work on CM also tends to legitimise the view of professional construction managers as experts with authority based on scientific knowledge.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | workers; operatives; HRM; research; knowledge; site management |
| Index terms: | construction manager, construction industry, management knowledge, site management, employment, higher education, knowledge base, operative |
| Subjects: | educational institutions, profession, management, information systems, professional development, practitioner, construction operations, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Site Management, Education, Information Management, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here