Ibiyemi, A; Adnan, Y M and Daud, M N (2014) An examination of the structure of sustainable facilities planning scale for user satisfaction in Nigerian universities. Construction Economics and Building, 14(3), pp. 58-73. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Universities are under increasing pressure to demonstrate that continuous performance improvement is being delivered for user satisfaction, but the importance of facilities planning as a student-staff focused tool needs to be emphasised. This research sought answers to questions relating to the underlying structure of sustainable facilities planning and user satisfaction, and the number of factors that make up the facilities planning scale. Three universities from the south-western part of Nigeria were selected randomly using ownership structure to define the cases: University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso and Joseph Ayo Babalola University, Ikeji Arakeji, each representing the Federal, State, and Private ownership. A questionnaire survey was used on a random sample of 651 staff and students from the three universities. Six hundred questionnaires were retrieved (response rate of 92.2%). An exploratory factor analysis was used to understand the responses and the interrelationships. The results showed a two-factor solution of 'locational advantages and user needs' and 'adequacy of facilities/functional connection and four core determinants for acceptance. It is concluded that universities should factor student-staff focus points into their facilities planning schemes to optimise their service deliveries. The study contributes to the discussion on factor structure of sustainable facilities planning scale with a focus on students and staff of universities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | data structure; facilities planning; factors; Nigeria; universities |
| Index terms: | user satisfaction, exploratory factor analysis, facilities planning, performance improvement, Lagos, questionnaire, service delivery, ownership, user need, data structure, determinant, Nigeria, survey |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, data science, economics, client relations, user-centered design, data collection methods, performance measurement, risk assessment, design process, service delivery, Geography |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here