Understanding the complexity of materials procurement and the role of technology for small and medium sized enterprises in the construction sector

Donyavi, S (2013) Understanding the complexity of materials procurement and the role of technology for small and medium sized enterprises in the construction sector. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.

Abstract

Materials can represent up to 70% of the project construction cost, hence, reducing wastage and improving productivity will have major benefits, both in economic terms for the SMEs but also the environment. Purchasing is a fundamental function of materials procurement. It is important for SME managers and owners to have a full understanding of the purchasing process. The research focuses on the process of purchasing materials and its complexity. It identifies the issues arising from the process from the perspective of small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), and seeks to understand their attitude and behaviour to the use of technology as a solution. Large companies have the capacity and capability to control labour and materials on projects using information and management technologies. However, SMEs represent over 90% of the UK construction sector, and they need help with systems to manage the materials purchasing process, from estimating to site use/storage. This research focuses on the impact of effective materials management on site for SMEs. The literature review and preliminary research showed an absence of system thinking by SMEs. This is mainly due to the organisational structure of the firms and their methods of working, but, most importantly, it is impacted by the lack of resources to systemise the approach, and a lack of feedback and joined-up systems. Past research identified a substantive list of factors in the materials' purchasing process, but lacked consideration of the importance and relative weighting of the issues. Very little of the research in the past has been focused on SMEs. A framework was established to show the sequence, the logical structure and the complexity of the purchasing process. It was based initially on information from the literature review, but later substantiated and enhanced by the on-site observations, semi-structured interviews and the document reviews. The data collection established a ranking of the issues and their occurrence on site. Technology was identified as a possible solution to making the process more effective and a number of mobile technologies were investigated to assess their relevance to, and ease of use by, SMEs in the purchasing process. The technologies were mapped against the framework to assess where they would be most useful and the results tested with further interviews with the selected SMEs as well as telephone interviews to a further twenty SMEs. The research revealed the complexity of the purchasing procedures and the challenges faced by SMEs in this important part of the construction process. It identified the issues involved in the process and ranked them using AHP, thus identifying the areas that were less efficient and where improvement was needed. Whilst a number of mobile technologies have proved to be the way forward for many (large) contractors, their applicability and ease of use was not apparent to the selected SMEs in this research. The data analysis showed the r willingness to consider using technologies in the process but mistrust in their effectiveness and affordability, as well as the impact of any training that would be required

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: complexity; construction cost; estimating; interview; materials management; organisational structure; procurement; productivity; purchasing; small and medium sized enterprises
Index terms: mobile technology, productivity, purchasing, owner, construction cost, small and medium sized enterprise, effectiveness, organizational structure, data analysis, manager, interview, literature review, construction process, materials management, complexity, affordability, estimating, construction sector
Subjects: practitioner, organization, economic analysis, digital technology, operations management, building construction, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, management, performance management, industry analysis, procurement strategy, systems engineering, sociology
Topics: Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Site Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here