Foulds, C (2013) Practices and technological change: the unintended consequences of low energy dwelling design. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, UK.
Abstract
There is an urgent need to reduce domestic energy consumption, particularly due to climate change. Domestic energy policies and research have been dominated by the assumption that technological provision will linearly save energy. Conventional attempts to move away from this approach have not gone far enough, tending to still assume that technological usage is a linear outcome of an individual’s rational decision-making. This thesis takes a significantly different approach by drawing on social practice theory and focusing on how everyday life is performed. Specifically, a Passivhaus housing development is adopted as a case study in investigating the everyday consequences of advancing dwelling design. Passivhaus is a German energy efficiency building standard, employing very different technologies relative to conventional UK housing. Specific attention is given to how unfamiliar technologies influence domestic practices more generally, as well as appliance-using practices and designing and constructing practices more specifically. This thesis has significant empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions. Empirically, everyday examples illustrate the unintended consequences of new technologies, providing insight on how such technologies could change practices in the future. Methodologically, by treating quantitative consumption-related data (e.g. building monitoring, appliance ownership, construction data) as by-products of performing practices, an innovative mixed methods approach provides unique insights on everyday practices. Theoretically, the potential usefulness of a practices approach is emphasised; in particular, in developing a detailed and contextual understanding of how everyday life is constructed and how it is open to change (often in unexpected ways). This thesis reiterates that research and policy should focus on practices, rather than technological performance or what individuals think about technologies. It concludes by: discussing a re-framing of policy expectations; outlining how energy saving interventions could target domestic practices and its influencing elements; and providing a series of new research ideas that have been generated by this thesis.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | social practice theory; climate; climate change; energy consumption; housing development; monitoring; Passivhaus; performance; policy; owner; efficiency; ownership; case study; energy efficiency |
| Index terms: | monitoring, energy consumption, energy-saving, ownership, technological change, owner, everyday life, efficiency, energy efficiency, case study, social practice theory, new technology, mixed method, low energy, Passivhaus, consumption, climate change, housing, decision-making, building monitoring, drawing, framing, energy policy, housing development, unintended consequence |
| Subjects: | conceptual models, innovation and technology management, public policy, consumer economics, innovation studies, climate science, construction type, asset management, theoretical framing, energy systems, sustainability and energy, technical documentation, control systems, risk assessment, data collection methods, decision analysis, sociology, energy efficiency, performance management, economics |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Site Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here