Khaemba, P (2013) Adoption of green building practices and rating system in Kenya: Potentials and barriers. PhD thesis, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, USA.
Abstract
This research study was undertaken to identify (a) green building rating attributes that could be adopted for Kenya, and (b) barriers to initial adoption of green building practices and a green building rating system in Kenya. The study was primarily built on the premise of select rating and adoption attributes in existing green building standards, especially Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). A pilot phase of the study was conducted using a combination of focus groups and personal interviews. The pilot findings became the basis of a questionnaire that was utilized to survey a sample of 608 registered building professionals in Kenya with a view of understanding their perspectives and awareness towards green building adoption. End-line data was interpreted using a combination of descriptive statistics, content analysis, and analysis of variance. Among other findings, this study revealed that 'energy and atmosphere' green building attributes have the highest potential, or likelihood, for adoption in Kenya. These were followed by 'water efficiency,' 'indoor environmental quality,' 'materials and resources,' and 'sustainable sites,' in that order. Further, the study revealed that lack of institutional support was the greatest barrier to adoption of green building in Kenya; followed by lack of regulatory and policy tools, socio-economic factors, and inadequate technical and awareness interventions, in that order. Statistically significant differences were noted in the mean responses for the demographic categories of (a) primary occupation, (b) sector of occupation, and (c) years of experience. This mixed method study was timely in providing a preliminary platform for developing green building guidelines and best practices that would be meaningful to the Kenyan building industry. Also, the findings would inform stakeholders about barriers that need to be overcome in order to accelerate green building adoption in Kenya.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Shofoluwe, M and Schimmel, K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building industry; standards; environmental design; green building; leadership; policy; Kenya; content analysis; best practice; professional; stakeholder; focus group; interview |
| Index terms: | interview, focus group, content analysis, occupation, survey, green building, questionnaire, Kenya, variance, efficiency, platform, mixed method, environmental design, building professional, building industry, best practice, indoor environmental quality, green building guidelines, statistics, policy tools, economic factor |
| Subjects: | policy studies, digital design, economic concepts, Geography, sustainable design, sustainability and energy, data analysis and analytics, business, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, profession, measurement and scaling, sociology, environmental health, industry analysis, performance management, design practice |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here