Ex-ante assessment of financial innovation policies in infrastructure system-of-systems

Mostafavi, A (2013) Ex-ante assessment of financial innovation policies in infrastructure system-of-systems. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.

Abstract

This dissertation focuses on the creation and testing of a paradigm in innovation and policy assessment in civil infrastructure system-of-systems (SoS). Many uncertain factors (e.g., economic conditions, public attitudes, political priorities, business dynamics, etc. ) affect the creation and diffusion of innovations in civil infrastructure. Policy-makers who evaluate innovation policies also face known unknowns (policy outcomes whose nature is known but their probability of occurrence is not known), as well as unknown unknowns (policy outcomes whose nature and probability of occurrence are not known), due to the adaptive behaviors of the players in the system. The overarching objective of this dissertation was to create and evaluate an ex-ante analytical framework for micro-simulation of infrastructure innovation policies under uncertain conditions. The developed framework was based on the abstraction and micro-simulation of the activities and interactions of the major players in the system, and its application is demonstrated for the assessment of sustainable financial innovation policies. Using the framework and data obtained from a wide range of sources, ranging from historical records and case studies to interviews with SMEs, the interdependencies of finance and transportation infrastructure were explored. These interdependencies (e.g., the effects of financial market conditions on the debt-related decisions made by state Departments of Transportation) then were used to develop a hybrid agent-based/system dynamics model for micro-simulation of sustainable financial innovation policies. Using this model and Monte-Carlo experimentation, the policy landscape of transportation Infrastructure in the U.S. was simulated. The model was verified and validated as follows: (1) by using sensitivity analysis and uncertainty propagation analysis and (2) through face validity by several SMEs from organizations such as the World Bank, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Federal Highway Administration. The results suggest that the simulated policy landscape is capable of identifying the significant factors that affect policy decisions and explore scenarios for closing the financing gap under uncertain conditions. This distinctive approach is the first of its kind to simulate the U.S. transportation infrastructure policy landscape by simulating the micro-dynamics of the system. This framework has the potential to be adopted for ex-ante simulation of the landscape of sustainable policies towards expansion of alternative energy systems, enhancing intelligent transportation systems, and improving the resilience of electric grids.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Abraham, D M
Uncontrolled Keywords: market; market condition; uncertainty; diffusion of innovation; highway; SMEs; innovation; policy; experiment; probability; case studies; interview; simulation
Index terms: case study, economic condition, adaptive behaviour, validity, World Bank, transportation infrastructure, paradigm, propagation, dynamics, unknowns, testing, interaction, dissertation, diffusion of innovation, interview, sensitivity analysis, market condition, face, experiment, alternative energy, system dynamics, agent, system-of-systems, analytical framework, financing
Subjects: research dissemination and communication, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, psychology, economic analysis, professional practice, theoretical framing, behavioral psychology, environmental hazards, engineering process, human factors, data collection methods, computing systems, economic and policy analysis, institutional frameworks, data analysis and analytics, energy systems, education and knowledge transfer, professional development, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here