Moussa, M A E-F M (2013) Unified simulation methodology and project risk assessment framework. PhD thesis, University of Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
Simulation applications in construction-project management are primarily limited to academic research. Where simulation has been used in project risk assessment in the industry, it has not been used to its potential. This research addresses two problems: the difficulty associated with using simulation, and the lack of project risk models that correctly reflect the risk identification assumptions. Surveys show that facilitating the modelling process and reducing programming efforts are the most important factors in increasing the appeal to simulation. Large models are impractical for standalone computers. Simulation methodologies serving construction projects are built around the cyclic operations that do not support seamless data transfer between the models and the data storage media. Project management systems are data driven where data are updated regularly, making it difficult to simultaneously keep models current Project risk management attempts to increase the chances of achieving project objectives; however, simulation-based risk-assessment models use range estimates that do not reflect the causal relationship between the risk events and the objectives’ outcomes. The literature on risk assessment recommends integration between risk-assessment tools and those of cost and schedule management. However, current simulation-based risk-assessment applications are standalone models built around the independent creation of random numbers that do not support integration within the project or within a portfolio of projects. This research has two objectives: increasing the appeal of simulations and facilitating the modeling process, and measuring project risks in an integrated environment. The researcher identified criteria that improve current simulation methodologies and simulation-based risk assessment methods, and developed the computer applications that incorporate these criteria. The simulation methodology provides a user-friendly interface with a built-in code generation and database integration for standalone and distributed models. The risk assessment framework allows the effects of risks on projects and portfolio objectives to be measured in an integrated environment. The risk assessment model was used by graduate students at the University of Calgary as part of the verification and validation process. Feedback from students confirmed that the simulation methodology increases the appeal to simulation and that calculating risk effects using the proposed framework produces better risk assessment than range estimate.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ruwanpura, J and Jergeas, G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project; feedback; integration; programming; project risk management; risk assessment; risk identification; risk management; graduate; simulation |
| Index terms: | computer application, project risk management, database, risk assessment, risk management, media, modelling, estimate, project management, simulation application, data storage, risk identification, survey, construction project, integration, methodology, programming, validation, graduate student |
| Subjects: | research methods, financial risk, production management, programming, curriculum design, analytical methods, software systems, professional development, project management theory and practice, sociology, organizational analysis, data management, data collection methods, risk assessment, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Education, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here