Sustainable building services systems management

Okon, B B (2013) Sustainable building services systems management. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.

Abstract

The rapid expansion in the construction industry worldwide has placed more pressure on the available natural resources, as the various construction activities and the services they require, increasingly draw on supplies of water and energy. The provision of these utilities and their continual maintenance activites within a building, promote human daily sustenance, and economic development generally, but the exploitation of these resources, their environmental impact, socio-economic implications, and sustainability, all necessitate proper management. Indeed, sustainability has now become the cornerstone for effective building services infrastructure and building construction management. It is against this backdrop that this study, which focuses on building services infrastructure and construction activities management, is set. The study aims to integrate the sustainability agenda in this context as a basis for achieving sustainable development goals. Increasingly, building services infrastructure processes and the interdisciplinary engineering fields cannot operate optimally without the incorporation of the sustainability agenda as a core management consideration. In pursuit of its aims, the study has employed various theoretical propositions, suitable methods, and frameworks, all aimed at addressing the sustainability issues as a way forward. The current technologies and management techniques related to building management do already offer sustainable and good quality service delivery, but the findings from this study have yielded value added contributions capable of promoting greater success in the drive for sustainability, by employing the sustainable engineering infrastructure (SEI) model, sustainability index matrix (SIM), and partial differential equation techniques. The SEI model was used in evaluating building services infrastructure characteristics within the UK and Nigeria in the study phases I– IV, and the outcomes are presented. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costs (LCC) methods were also applied to examine building services infrastructure systems and their performance in the study phase V. The LCA phase in this study considered ten environmental impacts during the construction, operation (use), maintenance, and the end-of-life phases of six buildings. The LCC technique appraised the use of construction materials, water, energy, and utilities to avoid duplication that leads to unnecessary costs in the aforementioned phases of buildings. The results of the different analyses are presented. Energy and utilities usage, together with carbon footprint management evaluation in both the healthcare and education sectors in the UK are also shown in the study phase VI. In appraising these scenarios, the partial differential equation method was adopted, generating results for the healthcare and education sectors of 0.74 and 0.62 respectively, which expresses a good degree of reliability of performance within these two particular contexts. In phase VII of the study, interviews with experts from academia and industry have corroborated the evidence secured from other phases of the research. There is also a novel discovery in this study, in its use of the SIM function which is able to provide a corresponding sustainability index result for buildings/facilities performance in respect of critical and strategic management decisions. The SIM has defined the sustainability index from probability theory within the limits of 0 ? Suv ? 1 for any given system function. The SIM and SEI models have been applied within some phases in this study based on the acquired data and the results are indicated. Additionally, there is a proposed algorithmic project life cycle framework with an allowance for either on/offsite recycling processes in managing building infrastructure challenges. In its scope, the study focuses on buildings (facilities) only, since the non-integration of sustainability ethics represents the major challenge undermining the building services infrastructure success. With this focus in mind, this study has delivered improved knowledge and understanding of the proper applications and management of building services infrastructure systems. This has been underpinned by the three themes of sustainable development for the present and future generations.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: economic development; environmental impact; ethics; healthcare; infrastructure; integration; interview; liability; life cycle cost; maintenance; materials; natural resources; nige
Index terms: ethics, life cycle, recycling, construction activity, natural resource, Nigeria, exploitation, utilities, systems management, carbon footprint, building service, service delivery, construction industry, partial differential equation, construction material, sustainable development goal, academia, life cycle assessment, sustainable development, building construction, life cycle cost, interview, economic development, building management, liability, strategic management, sustainable building, integration, evidence, environmental impact
Subjects: educational institutions, organizational analysis, industry analysis, management, service delivery, building materials, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, value management, engineering systems, building construction, liability law, research methods, economic development, sustainable construction, sustainable design, Geography, health safety and environment, environmental resource management, analytical methods, ethical practice, construction operations, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, environmental impact, waste management
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Education, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here