Rawlinson, F and Farrell, P (2009) The vision of zero risk tolerance in craft workers and operatives: An unattainable goal? In: Dainty, A R J (ed.) Proceedings of 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2009, Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
Taking health and safety risks is no longer tolerated on construction sites. Behavioural based safety model programmes often seek to change risk-taking behaviours and eliminate accidents. Risk is a cultural construct. Site work can be seen as inherently risky. Construction operatives take many risks that non-construction workers would not want to take; for example working on high scaffolds or roofs, climbing tower cranes, working below ground. This is in part why some people work in construction; they like taking those risks. Safety programmes impose a risk limit of zero on people. This would seem to be in conflict with an argument that some workers need to have, by the very nature of their work, a higher risk tolerance than most. Programmes often fail to manage personal risk-taking and therefore accidents still occur. A literature review was undertaken, drawing from authoritative sources in construction and psychology. Six qualitative interviews were undertaken with craft workers / operatives who had either been disciplined for risk-taking on sites or who admitted to taking risks in their work. Condensed into vignettes, a narrative describes the actions and feelings of these workers. A high tolerance for risk was found, and given the nature of the work, this may indeed be necessary. There was no desire for reckless behaviour. The traditional industry drivers of production and speed are thought to be influential. High risk tolerance amongst workers may indicate that a vision of zero accidents may be unrealistic. To reduce levels of risk tolerance may be very difficult. More work is required to investigate how behavioural based programmes can be modified to take account of this aspect of construction site culture.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | craft worker; culture; health; risk; safety |
| Index terms: | interview, risk taking, vignette, health and safety, tower crane, construction site, literature review, drawing, programme, narrative, construction operative, roof, construction worker, psychology, site work, operative |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, project controls, health safety and environment, qualitative and interpretive research, design practice, maintenance engineering, decision-making and reasoning, data analysis and analytics, site logistics, technical documentation, work location, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Site Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here