An evaluative framework for defects in new residential buildings: The New Zealand case

Rotimi, F E (2013) An evaluative framework for defects in new residential buildings: The New Zealand case. PhD thesis, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.

Abstract

The achievement of quality performance is an important component in the handover stage of new residential buildings, and plays a key role in homeowners’ satisfaction levels. Every new homeowner wants a product that is defect-free and worth the utmost value for their investment. Unfortunately this is not generally the case, since majority of newly built homes have been found to contain significant number of defects. Defects have become a main issue for concern to house developers, approving authorities, end-users and the construction industry as a whole. Therefore the aim of this research is to improve quality achievement levels through the reduction or complete eradication of defects at the handover stage of new residential buildings in New Zealand. To achieve this aim and its attendant interstitial objectives, the study employed a mixed method research approach involving questionnaire surveys, interviews, and research verification using key industry stakeholders (subject matter experts). The investigations cover five regions in New Zealand: Auckland, Wellington, Waikato, Canterbury and Otago region, so that the entire population of new homeowners is truly represented. The research generated a list of common defects and provides insight into the extent of defects experienced by new homeowners at handover. This information enhances the understanding of quality performance in the residential and wider construction industry. Major causes of defects were found to be poor workmanship and material quality. These are attributable to lack of training, poor apprenticeship schemes, skills of imported trades, and poor monitoring of imported building products. It is made apparent from the current research that standard operating procedures (SOP) for quality achievement would need to be maintained across all house developer organisations in New Zealand. The research also found that the use of independent building inspectors for new homes is at a low level. It is therefore suggested that independent building inspection be made part of pre-purchase agreements and would make developers liable for defect rectification within a reasonable time frame. In the same light, the research suggests that financial institutions make the release of mortgages, conditional upon the provision of independent building inspectors’ reports for all categories of buildings.The current research shows that creating awareness and establishing a national warranty scheme will address the lack of uniformity and inconsistencies in new home warranties in the residential sector. This research has added new data to existing literature and provided a good wealth of information with respect to current quality performance in the house building sector in New Zealand.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Tookey, J and Neitzert, T
Uncontrolled Keywords: population; residential; skills; homes; apprenticeship; house building; inspection; investment; monitoring; training; workmanship; New Zealand; mortgage; developer; stakeholder; interview; questionnaire survey
Index terms: survey, warranty, interview, satisfaction, inspection, standard operating procedure, mortgage, quality performance, Wellington, New Zealand, residential building, construction industry, population, investigation, apprenticeship, agreements, mixed method research, workmanship, homeowner, questionnaire, low level, monitoring
Subjects: project delivery, control systems, quality assurance, construction type, industry analysis, sociology, economic analysis, performance measurement, data collection methods, contract formation, measurement and scaling, professional education, contractual condition, demography, process management, research methods, Geography
Topics: Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Education, Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Site Management, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here