Soomro, M A (2013) Failure mechanisms in transportation public private partnerships. PhD thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
Abstract
Transportation Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) are institutional arrangements designed to facilitate private business activities in public transportation networks. The adoption of transportation PPPs is based upon governments’ efforts to achieve extended efficiency, economy and effectiveness in comparison to the conventional infrastructure procurement systems. However, introducing profit oriented activities in public infrastructures, which basically run on the principles of social welfare, have brought numerous new management issues and risks that were never before observed in the conventional infrastructures procurement systems. New to such risks, the public sector personnel become prone to make mistakes that could cause loss of value to the public and even partnership failure. On the other hand, private sector companies motivated by profit making capacity of transportation PPPs played certain roles that could inflict upon the social welfare attached with the project, which raised socio-political concerns. Therefore, along with a long list of successful transportation PPP projects, there also lies a notable amount of failed transportation PPP projects. This research is motivated by such failed transportation PPP projects. The research embarks with comprehensive case studies of failed transportation PPPs through the aid of a structured methodology named ‘event sequence mapping (ESM). The ESM helped in identifying 46 failure drivers in transportation PPPs. The causal relationships among failure drives are then identified and named ‘failure mechanisms’. The failure mechanisms associated with public and private sector partners and with the socio-political issues are then evaluated and discussed. All failure mechanisms are then consolidated together to develop an integrated failure mechanism model. A questionnaire survey is conducted to assess the validity and expert opinion on the failure drivers. The questionnaire survey responses are then utilized to perform multiple regression path analysis (MRPA) to assess the strength of causal effects and statistical significance of the identified failure mechanisms. Based on the results of MRPA a statistical significant integrated failure mechanism model is proposed in the last. The integrated failure mechanism model has demonstrated a complex but comprehensive network of failure paths emerging from potential mistakes of the project partners and the socio political factors. The integrated failure mechanisms model has depicted the way failure mechanisms originated at different domains and then blend to act together to make a transportation PPP failure.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Zhang, X |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | effectiveness; efficiency; failure; personnel; private sector; government; partnership; public infrastructure; public private partnerships; multiple regression; case studies; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | survey, procurement system, case study, efficiency, private sector, effectiveness, public transportation, methodology, public private partnership, path analysis, multiple-regression, mapping, validity, profit, questionnaire, public sector, project partner, political factor, management issue, partnership, public infrastructure, personnel |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, partnership management, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, industry analysis, performance management, political science, statistical analysis, management, sociology, administrative law, research methods, evaluation and assessment methods, spatial and geospatial analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here