Wheat, P E (2013) Econometric cost analysis in vertically separated railways. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Abstract
This thesis is concerned with addressing the cost analysis challenges in vertically separated railways. Both the challenges in infrastructure management and passenger railway operations are considered. A hedonic cost function is applied to better incorporate measures of heterogeneity of output into passenger train operation cost analysis. This allows for a richer understanding of the cost structure of the industry, through explicitly making scale economies a function of output heterogeneity, which in turn allows for tenders to be specified in a cost minimising manner. Three example tender re-mappings are considered for Britain. It is estimated that two out of three actually increase costs, reflecting that the model implies that for very heterogeneous TOCs, returns to density can not be exploited. In addition, the thesis details methodological work in developing analytical frameworks to exploit a multi layer panel dataset comprising observations on regions of many individual infrastructure managers. As well as providing extra observations to estimate cost frontiers, the data structure permits estimation of a dual-level inefficiency model which separates sub-company persistent inefficiency from subcompany varying inefficiency. This decomposition gives an indication as to whether inefficiency predominantly varies within firm or between firms. The example shows statistically significant inefficiency variation at both levels, and importantly, failure to take into account the dual-level nature of inefficiency is shown to under predict inefficiency. The thesis also develops new techniques to quantify uncertainty in inefficiency predictions from stochastic frontier models. This has application across the applied efficiency analysis discipline and not just in railways. Overall, this thesis finds that robust cost and efficiency analysis can only be conducted through explicit allowance for heterogeneity in output (both observed and unobserved), ensuring sufficient data quantity and that data relates to the organisational level to which decisions are made and that, in any analysis, the impact of uncertainty is quantified.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost analysis; infrastructure management; railway; efficiency; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | analytical framework, dataset, data structure, variation, mapping, manager, cost analysis, estimate, econometric, estimation, density, efficiency, infrastructure management |
| Subjects: | infrastructure engineering, spatial and geospatial analysis, economic analysis, analytical methods, practitioner, data management, contractual condition, performance management, data analysis and analytics, data science, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here