Willetts, R (2013) Investigating the multiple influences affecting sustainability in a multidisciplinary engineering consultancy. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
Abstract
Sustainability has been an issue receiving growing attention in the past decade and the construction sector has not escaped notice. There has been a response at both the Government and industry level, to the agenda; with agreement that the industry must address sustainability by acting to minimise its impacts on both the environment and society. While much focus has been placed on how to minimise these impacts in the building sector, far less attention has been given to the infrastructure sector. Again while attention has been given to the construction process and acknowledging the potential for maximising impact reduction at the design stage, the focus given to the relationship between sustainability and consultant engineers has been limited. This research sets out to understand the influences affecting sustainability in a multidisciplinary engineering consultancy, with an emphasis on the environment and the design stage. Utilising a selection of research methods (i.e. case studies, archival analysis, interviews, causal loops and questionnaires) an understanding was developed illustrating the influence that clients, strategic and operational organisational issues, policy and engineers knowledge, have on implementing sustainability. Relating the research to the existing literature, it was possible to propose a number of interventions to promote the integration of sustainability within a consultancy.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | archival analysis; case study; causal loops; engineers; interview; multidisciplinary practice; questionnaire survey; sustainability |
| Index terms: | integration, construction process, questionnaire, design stage, construction sector, infrastructure sector, consultancy, interview, society, survey, organizational issue, case study, engineer |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, industry analysis, business, data collection methods, profession, building construction, communities and social development, professional practice, organization |
| Topics: | Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here