Xi, J (2013) Evaluating the functional performance of small-scale public demountable buildings. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
This thesis investigates the design, operation and use of contemporary demountable buildings, and explores how functional performance can be assessed in small-scale examples for public use alongside with their relationship to other design elements. The research focuses on three case studies that do not require a high-technology building environment or complex construction skills. Demountable buildings are defined as those that are transported in a number of parts for assembly on site. Contemporary demountable buildings respond to ecological issues, social impacts, technological innovation and economic demands. They can be used to measure a society’s development in environmental sustainability, innovation and economic growth through various forms. Small-scale demountable buildings fulfil many temporary habitation needs in diverse roles, such as non-emergency transitional housing, ephemeral exhibition buildings and seasonal entertainment facilities. The purpose of examining functional performance is to assess if, and how, the requirements of the design have been achieved. This enables project operators to address functional performance from a public perspective by reflecting on the scope and ambition of their projects. This thesis draws on existing literature to investigate previous and on-going research relating to demountable buildings, including classification, the construction process and project management. It also examines selected existing evaluation methods that cover principles, modelling and computer-based solutions from a wider research area, including Guidelines Developed by City Council and Culture Sectors; Assessment Methods in Humanitarian Response and Methods in Environmental Assessment. The research was conducted by combining both quantitative and qualitative research methods, including field research, case studies, interviews, questionnaires and group discussions. Fragmented narratives were transformed into structured evidence, identifying models of best performance in demountable buildings and developing a new method – the Evaluation Conceptual Model – for the effective evaluation and evidencing of the value of demountable buildings in the 21st century. Recommendations for adapting a suitable model to evaluate other design elements in demountable buildings and other types of moveable buildings in further research are suggested and the findings have been used to lay the foundations for a practical evaluation tool for the future.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kronenburg, R and Lewis, J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | culture; economic growth; skills; social impact; sustainability; technological innovation; foundations; environmental assessment; innovation; research methods; case studies; interview; qualitative research |
| Index terms: | interview, society, qualitative research method, narrative, construction process, qualitative research, questionnaire, evidence, environmental sustainability, environmental assessment, housing, humanitarian, case study, technological innovation, evaluation tool, economic growth, foundations, modelling, social impact, project management |
| Subjects: | qualitative and interpretive research, project management theory and practice, sociology, data collection methods, research design and methodology, health safety and environment, economic development, structural engineering, communities and social development, building construction, environmental impact, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, innovation and technology management, analytical methods, principle |
| Topics: | Ethics, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Site Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here