Automated progress control using laser scanning technology

Zhang, C (2013) Automated progress control using laser scanning technology. PhD thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, USA.

Abstract

Assessing progress in different construction activities at the end of every payment period is time consuming and requires specialized personnel employed by the contractor and the owner. Automatic progress control that requires a minimum amount of human involvement could reduce the time spent on this activity, reduce the number of personnel used, reduce the cost involved, reduce disagreements between contractor and owner, and add to the overall efficiency of project management. Attempts have been made in the past to resolve this issue using image processing and other techniques but the results have not been satisfactory. A new attempt was made to set up a system that can assess progress control with minimum human input and the results are presented in this paper. The experiment made use of laser scanning technology and was conducted both in laboratory conditions and construction sites. The initial results from laboratory condition appear to be promising but there are still obstacles to surmount. The system is robust and accurate in laboratory conditions and constitutes proof of concept. Improvements are made to accelerate the registration process of multiple scans, to reduce the noise data, to recognize objects of irregular shape, and to assess the practicality and economic feasibility of such a system when applying this system in real construction sites.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: efficiency; personnel; construction site; noise; laser scanning; payment; owner; experiment
Index terms: image processing, personnel, laboratory, owner, construction site, laser scanning, experiment, project management, efficiency, construction activity
Subjects: computer vision, data collection methods, analytical methods, construction operations, management, sociology, work location, performance management, project management theory and practice, research management
Topics: Site Management, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here